I'd like to ask fellow TMians to be the judges on this one:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scheng75
Your post comes across as arrogant. We try to encourage each other and not make people feel stupid. Plus, plenty of "top researchers" disagree with one another.
|
Dear scheng75,
It appears to me this is the second time you twist the meaning of my words. And then perephraze just what I said to use it as a counterargument:
http://www.urch.com/forums/showthrea...9&page=2&pp=15 (A Econ question)
xeno:
"...These are just different names people use to describe the same ..."
scheng:
"..plenty of "top researchers" disagree with one another"
When people use different names for the same object, they in other words disagree on the name of the object, don't you think?
This might be a gentle reminder to listen to what other people actually say, before judging them. While I agree my post was a bit laconic, I doubt it made anyone
"feel stupid" if they read the words, but if it did - my sincere apologies, no offense was meant.
