Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpion.ks
May be you are right. I think B is free for interpretation.
If we disect them,
A is : depression with unemp -> strain a society
and
B is : depression (provided unemp) -> strain a society
but depression (NO unemp) may not be a strain a society
Is that what you meant by "changing the meaning"?
|
well I meant changing the meaning as in -1) x, with y, leads to Z
2) x that,because of y, leads to Z
1 says that x and y are two independent things but they together cause Z, but 2 says, X which is caused because of Y leads to Z - as if it is mandatory to have Y as a factor- hence changes meaning.