Hey all, I'm trying to make a decision and I'd appreciate any advice. I may have the chance to RA for (and get
LORs from) two very well published IMF economists. The trouble is I would have to make a 2 year commitment which would push back my starting a PhD by at least 1 year, and I'm trying to decide if it's worth it. Here's my profile:
Type of Undergrad: Top 25 with a top 40ish econ program. BA in econ.
Undergrad GPA: Overall: 3.74, Econ: 3.8ish, Math: bad.
Type of Grad: Not highly ranked, top 100ish. MS in applied math.
Grad GPA (so far): 3.9
GRE: 790Q / 740V / 5.0
AWA.
Math Courses:
Undergrad: Calc III (B+), ODE (C- (Ouch, I know)), Real Analysis (A-), Linear Algebra (A). The first two classes I took my very first year in college, so I'm hoping they'll be discounted.
Grad: Measure Theory (A-), Math Stats (A), ODE (A), Functional Analysis (A)
Econ Courses:
Undergrad: A bunch, the important ones are Intro. Micro (A), Intro. Macro (A), Mathematical Micro (A), Intermediate Macro (B+), Econ Stats (B+), Econometrics (A). The rest are As in field courses.
Grad: PhD Micro I (A-), PhD Micro II (A)
Letters of Recommendation: 1 from a Fed Economist, 1from my functional analysis prof, and 1 from the prof I RAed for. All will have nice things to say about me, but only the prof I RAed for is well known.
Research Experience: Two month stint at the IMF, summer at the Fed, senior thesis, 1 year + 1 summer as an RA for a professor.
Teaching Experience: None
Research Interests: International Finance, Time Series
Any thoughts?