Quote:
Originally Posted by ruchia
1. Study says sharp increase in vision problems in sunny regions over 3 years - but does not give any evidence that the people who have experienced it were actually using So-Low glasses.
2. It is stated that So-Low block a smaller proportion of the Sun's rays, including the type of rays known to damage the eyes - perhaps it would be worthwhile to find out if the rays that are not blocked by So-low may also be harmful.
3. Author concludes people should wear higher priced brands - but there is no evidence that those glasses also actually protect it. A brand like So-Low may be priced higher. Also, there is no evidence that wearing no glasses would be better than wearing So-Low glasses.
|
1. -- yes, argument says that the
study suggests that so-low glasses may be harmful which may be author's misinterpretation of the study. Good point.
2 -- to attack the argument, we should probably support So-Low brand, not further disparage it. So don't see how this is helpful.
3 -- good point. higher price is no guarantee of better protection.
Thanks ruchia.