Sponsored Ad:
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: LSE vs UPF

  1. #1
    Trying to make mom and pop proud
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    7


    Good post? Yes | No

    LSE vs UPF

    Sponsored Ad:
    Hi everyone!

    I would like to ask you for your oppinion about these two options: MSc in Economics at UPF and MSc in Economics (Research) at LSE. Both MSc last for 1 year and I was offered a full tuition fee waiver at UPF.

    I am currently employed in Analysis&Reseach Department of a central bank and I am especially intereseted in knowledge of econometrics and macroeconomics. I probably won`t continue my studies with PhD, at least not right after MSc. I intend to continue my career at one of european institutions.

    So I would like to know is it really worth to give 17,352 pounds for a tuition fee at LSE, not to mention the fact that the life is much more expensive in London than in Barcelona. So do the professors at LSE lecture much better than those at UPF.

    Thank you very much for all your advices

  2. #2
    Happy to be here
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    7


    Good post? Yes | No
    Hello,

    I got accepted at both:LSE and UPF. Hands down: LSE. In everything I red, LSE is much better than UPF. Many people get out of LSE and go to PhD in very good universities. I think it is worth it to go to LSE.

    But it is your choice.

    Good luck,

  3. #3
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage asianeconomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    1,269
    Rep Power
    14


    Good post? Yes | No
    LSE has better reputation in the industry and academia in comparison to UPF. UPF however places quite well from its Masters program. However, since you are not interested (in the short-term at least) in academia, LSE is the better option. The only qualifier being of course that cost does not matter.

  4. #4
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    392
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    I agree,
    LSE is the better choice, plus LSE graduates have one of the highest starting salaries in the UK

  5. #5
    Bunkered down in prep
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    7


    Good post? Yes | No
    As the UPF MSc Economics is now the BGSE MSc Economics you now have an institution that compares pretty favourably with LSE (UPF+UAB gets pretty close to LSE in rankings even without IAE-CSIC and CREI), although if you plan to work at some point in the UK the LSE brand is definitely worth quite a bit.

    I personally think the LSE fees are horrendous and you can get as good, or nearly as good an MSc with access to excellent faculty in an equally vibrant location at no cost - relative to 17K! Would the LSE brand add significantly to your earning power in the public sector/ central bank to justify the cost?

    Just my take, maybe you've had to decide already?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2009, 04:55 AM
  2. UPF vs. Warwick vs. Oxford vs. Cambridge vs. LSE
    By amad123 in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 06:46 PM
  3. UPF vs LSE
    By mojito08 in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 05:54 PM
  4. EHESS vs Louvain vs LSE vs UPF
    By milt0916 in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-12-2007, 03:02 PM
  5. In at UPF!
    By gzuz in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-05-2007, 07:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.