Mayankgupta2007

In the above argument the author cites the value of price in the two coast, Gulf coast and Altantic coast. Consumers were willing for the last five as it is free from bacteria, but after the technique devised by the scientist the consumer's idea towards it has changed. Author provides some good reason s but it cannot be taken as the only reason to support the argument.

Firstly, the author has not described the process for removing the bacteria. Sometimes the process used makes the oysters unpalatable as it will be chemicals driven. Chemicals used in this process can be harmfl for these oysters. Authors must circumscibe some chemicals used for removing bacteria so that consumers will have apposite awareness.

Secondly, profits can only be followed if the consumers get the desired quantity in less amount. As oysters are treated with some chemicals (for removing bacteria) inflation in the price is automatically going to occur, Author has to mention the new price stastitics comparing atlantic coast and gulf coast to make consumers aware of the priduct with proper apropos.

Profits are goind to happen only when the people are aware of the ongoin process. Dealers or suppliers must advertise or endorse the priduct in order to make each and every person aware of the product . It will increase the value of the product. This point can be included in the argument to strengthen the argument.