Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Children

  1. #1
    Eager! blackwoods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    37
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No

    Children

    In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
    Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?
    (A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin.
    (B) No two children understood the name “rolling pin” to apply to the same object.
    (C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.
    (D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used
    (E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.

  2. #2
    Eager!
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    66
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    i ll go with D ....................

  3. #3
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    630
    Rep Power
    10


    Good post? Yes | No
    I would go with B.

    C and E are out because they are contrary to the conclusion.

    D. talks about utensils but not rolling pin.
    A. talks about the function. The children probably understood the function of the rolling pin as they used it to roll out the dough.

  4. #4
    Eager!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    63
    Rep Power
    8


    Good post? Yes | No
    B as per me.

  5. #5
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    186
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    My Choice is B

  6. #6
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage dimbulb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    526
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No
    B states clearly the error .
    OA only after detail explanation.

  7. #7
    Eager! Paa"ji"forMBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    72
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    I'd go with B

  8. #8
    Eager! manikaryekar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    47
    Rep Power
    8


    Good post? Yes | No
    I would go with E. E infers that students did not recognize difference between rolling pin they used and other "rolling pins" (which they did not know as rolling pin).

    E sounds right to me.

    Anyone letting us know official answer???

  9. #9
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fremont
    Posts
    548
    Rep Power
    10


    Good post? Yes | No
    Clearly B.

  10. #10
    Eager!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    52
    Rep Power
    8


    Good post? Yes | No
    Add a vote for B.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2 or 3 children
    By ACETARGET in forum GMAT Problem Solving
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-16-2008, 12:26 AM
  2. For some children !!
    By bhar_rohit in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 07:20 PM
  3. children
    By powerthelogic in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 03:57 PM
  4. AJ :: The Three Children DS
    By AJPEROT in forum GMAT Data Sufficiency
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-07-2006, 01:06 PM
  5. They are children :)
    By atnoon in forum Lounge
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2002, 04:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.