Here, the argument says that National Laboratories (NL) have tested Bolter's product and hence, the product is safer even when untrained operators use it.
Additional information needed
- Did the test by NL also include how safe is the product when used by untrained operators?
- What are the safety test results? Did NL certify and pass the safety test on Bolter's product or did NL fail the product?
Any of this information can lead us to judge the argument. C does exactly this.
A - irrelevant
B - Regardless of importance, the argument mentions that it safe. Irrelevant
C - Addresses the above missing information
D - Even if there are other ways, the argument is about Bolter's product being safer than all other competing products
E - Who cares? Its about safety.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks







Reply With Quote

Bookmarks