Jump to content
Urch Forums

The current move to patent


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I need help in solving the CR below:

 

The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Computer programs should be developed not only be large corporations but by small-time inventors as well.

(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention.

© The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen.

(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies.

(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo B.

 

Premise : purpose of patent to support small investor not large coporations

Premise : computer program is implementation of methadology

Conclusion: patenting of computer program should be stopped

 

Assumption : (atleast what i was looking for) - implementing mathdology poses a benefit to large corporations

B fits the bill perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Computer programs should be developed not only be large corporations but by small-time inventors as well. How can "should be" be an assumption.. ("are developed" would have been correct)

(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention. Program is implementation of methodology.. so program patented means methodology patented

© The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen. - irrelevant

(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies. - again use of "should" means it is not an assumption

(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests - irrelevant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...