IMO B
1. try n=2q+1
Put q =1, 2 , 3, 4, 5
When we divide n by 3 we get different remained.
2. n=3q+2-1
Put q =1, 2,3, 4, 5
When we divide n by 3 we get just one remainder. ie 1
Hence Suff
B

We can represent the question as n=3x+r. What is r?
1) Given n=2x+1. But this doesn't give enough info about divisibility by 3.
e.g, x can be 1, so n=3 and r(reminder when divided by 3)=0
x=2, n=5, r=2
Insuff
2) n+1=3x+2
n=3x+1. This proves that r=1 so sufficient.
Hence the answer is B
Last edited by genius_in_the_gene; 10-08-2008 at 07:30 PM.



There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks