Go Back   TestMagic Forums > Test preparation > GMAT > GMAT Math > GMAT Data Sufficiency
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2009 October 30th, 07:21 AM   #1 (permalink)
Eager!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
kutra just joined TestMagic.
Inequality

If n is not equal to 0, is |n| < 4 (Does this mean n2 < 16 ) ?

(1) n2 > 16
(2) 1/|n| > n

Hiow would you solve this algebraically?
I seem to be getting IMO as D when I do it the squaring both sides method for stmt 2?

1 > n|n|
Squaring both sides
1 > n2n2
n4 < 1




HELP!
kutra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 07:51 AM   #2 (permalink)
TestMagic Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,845
finsisher just joined TestMagic.
imo D

ist stmt, n^2>16 implies n >4 or n<-4 sufficient

2nds stmt 1 > n mod n ( since mod n is positive we can multiply both sides by mod n without changing the sign of inequality)
implies n^2 <1 implies n is b/w -1 and 1

hence D
finsisher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 07:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
first attempt:timed out
 
sh_vivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 842
sh_vivek just joined TestMagic.
Is something wrong with the question?

From I: n<-4 or n>4
From II:-1<n<1

The range of n from I and II does not overlap. IN GMAT DS, both statements do not contradict each other.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
--The Alchemist

sh_vivek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 08:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
Within my grasp!
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 130
ForestGump just joined TestMagic.
IMO A!!
(i) it implies n >4 and n<-4...in both the cases mod n is >4

whereas
(ii) n!n! < 1..
!n! will always b +ve..
n can have any value..fractions ,-ve, but no +ve value greater than 1.
so we n
ForestGump is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 08:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Within my grasp!
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 130
ForestGump just joined TestMagic.
IMO A!!
(i) it implies n >4 and n<-4...in both the cases mod n is >4

whereas
(ii) n!n! < 1..
!n! will always b +ve..
n can have any value..fractions ,-ve, but no +ve value greater than 1.
so we are not sure abt the value of !n!..
ForestGump is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 01:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
White is colour &so be it
 
Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 871
Fiver just joined TestMagic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sh_vivek View Post
Is something wrong with the question?

From I: n<-4 or n>4
From II:-1<n<1

The range of n from I and II does not overlap. IN GMAT DS, both statements do not contradict each other.
Actually the stmts do not contradict each other.
Stmt1] means |n| > 16. Therefore n>4 or n<-4
Stmt2] means that n is either a proper fraction or a negative number, which means that n<-4 is still applicable; hence the answer could be a no or a yes respectively.
My answer is A.
What's the OA?
Fiver is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 03:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Eager!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
kutra just joined TestMagic.
OA is A. What I fail to understand is, if Stmt 2 is done by squariing both sides, OA should be D.
kutra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 2009 October 30th, 10:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 728
clock60 just joined TestMagic.
i think that the answer A
is -4<x<4-???
(1) n^2-16>0
(n-4)(n+4)>0 the given expression is valid for x>4 and x<-4 and the answer is definitely no so sufficient
(2) the second is tricky one
i am not sure that we can square as x may be negative
so two cases exists x>0 and x<0
if x>0
1/|x|=1/x and 1/x>x, (1-x^2)>0, (1-x)(1+x)>0 x=1 and x=-1
valid for interval (-1,1) but x>0 so (0,1)
if x<0
-(1/x)-x>0
1/x+x<0
(1+x^2)/x<0
1+x^2>0 in all cases
so x<0
and it follows for
1/|x|>x to be valid x must be less than 1 and not equal to 0
let us check for different values of x
if x=0,5, 1/0,5=2, 2>0,5
if x=-0,5 1/0,5=2 2>-0,5
if x=2 1/2<2
from second st we know that x<4 ( as is it less that 1) but it can be greater or lesser than -4
so A
clock60 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

What you can do
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You cannot edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Contact TestMagic   TestMagic Forums      Archive   Privacy Statement

TestMagic Locations   Legal   Privacy


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger

Scroll Up