|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Push it to the limit!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 2,600
![]() |
OG10 DS 215 multiple of 24
Is the positive integer n a multiple of 24?
1) n is a multiple of 4 2) n is a multiple of 6 my approach to this question is as follows step 1. multiples of 24 means 24, 48, 72 ..... step 2. 1) multiple of 4 : 4,8,12,16,20,24,28..... among these number above, 24 and 48 are multiple of 24. ---> insufficient step 3. 2) multiple of 6 : 6,12,18, 24,30, 36.... among these number above, 24 and 48 are multiple of 24 ---> insufficient taken together it is still insufficient. gurus, I got an right answer. However how do gurus solve/approach to this question? my reasoning is acceptable? Thank you for your help! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 175
![]() |
Quote:
Multiple of 6 are in the form of 2*3*k , where k is any integer Multiple of 4 are in the form of 2*2*m , where m is any integer Stat(1): 4, 8..are not multiple of 24 : insufficient. Stat(2): 6, 12..are not multiple of 24 : insufficient. Take both the statements together Find the LCM(Least common multiple) of 6 (2*3) and 4(2*2).. LCM is 12: >>> (highest power of 2 * highest power of 3) >>> 2^2 *3 And 12 is not the multiple of 24.. And we reach to thy answer.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Share the Love
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 73
![]() |
the key is that all multiples of 12 will occur in both lists (list of multiples of 4, and list of multiples of 6),
12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, ... but not all multiples of 12 are necessarily multiples of 24, notice that every other number is not a multiple of 24. So that's why E is correct |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: mumbai
Posts: 292
![]() |
I believe in the factors approach....
Factors of 24 are 2,2,2,3 1) n is a multiple of 4. factors are 2,2.... 2,3 still left to be divisible.. insuff 2) n is a multiple of 6 factors are 2,3....2,2 still left..insuff 1 and 2. lcm 2*2*3 factor 2 still left out... insuff E I guess for easy numbers your approach is fine, but when numbers are large, this approach will be better to avoid doing unnecessary calculations.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
Looking high and Low
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger