rd_eastbay Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 The average of 5 disitinct single digit integers is 5. If 2 of the integers are discarded, the new average is 5. What is the largest of the 5 integers. (1) Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes (2) The smallest intger is 3 OA is A. I don't agree with it - I get B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arjmen Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 Yep, I get B too with 7 as the largest integer. Can't see how statement I would give a unique solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rd_eastbay Posted June 26, 2005 Author Share Posted June 26, 2005 Thanks Arj. I think the OA assumes (1) no negative integers and (2) all primes are consecutive (rather than the longest sequence is that of 3 primes). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmaholic Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 Can we expect this question on the GMAT? I see the assumptions RD has made. I'm still not sure if we can make these assumptions while takin the test. Would you suggest doing that (making assumptions) if u found this question on the test, irrespective of what u chose as the answer? Just curious... and a bit confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rd_eastbay Posted June 26, 2005 Author Share Posted June 26, 2005 Frankly, the assumptions should not be made in a quesiton like this. B is the correct answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forshomide Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Actually, A by itselfis wrong. First, all five numbers are single digits: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Also, we know that the sum of the 5 numbers gives 25(5*5) and the sum of 3 of the numbers gives 15(3*5). Now if 3 of the numbers are consecutive prime #s, the following are possible 0 + 1 + 3 = 3, which mean the other two numbers must add to 25-3=22. From above none of the remaining numbers will add to 22 Likewise, for 1+2+3 = 5, none of the two numbers left will add to 20 for 2+3+5 =10, two numbers, 8 and 7 will add to 15 => 10 + 15 = 25 . This makes 8 the largest integer for, 3+5+7 = 15, 9 and 1 add to 10 to make 9 the largest number. Sine A gives two possible largest numbers, it should not be the right ans. Now, lets look at (2) and Let 3 be the smallest #, the following are possible: 3+4+5+6+7 = 25 => 7 = largest 3+6+7+9 = 25=> 9 = largest Just like (1), we also have more than one possible ans. For these reasons, I pick E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_cute Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Guys, please explain how you arrived at B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vimo Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Hi guys i pick E as well, because like Foshomide stated the 2 statements will give us more than one value for the largest integer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forshomide Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Correction from my proevious explanation: 0 and 1 are not prime numbers. However, I still believe the ans. should be E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arangarajan Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Guys, The answer should be B 1st Statement:Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes 1st statement rules out the fact that there can be no negative integers because we need a total of 25 to get the average of 5 for 5 numbers. 3 consecutive primes can be 2,3,5 or 3,5,7 Case 1 : 2,3,5 -- the other 2 numbers should be 9 and 6 they cannot be 7 and 8 because only 3 of the integers are consecutive primes which are already 2,3 and 5. there fore the numbers can be 2,3,5,6,9. But we cannot remove 2 numbers to arrive at a sum of 15 for the other 3 and maintain an average of 5. therefore the 3 consecutive primes should be 3,5,7 if the 3 primes are 3,5,7 then the other 2 can be 1,9 or 6 and 4. This gives 2 solutions for the largest integer namely 9 or 7 therefore statement 1 is insufficient , where as Statement 2 categorically mentions that 3 is the smallest integer and therefore only one set of solution exists to arrive at the sum of 25 and 15 Which is 3,4,5,6,7 . Therefore the answer is B Alternately statement 2 implies : 5/2(3+L) = 25 giving the highest value for L as 7. using the AP formula for the sum of 5 numbers starting with 3. Hope this clarifies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
satyendgmail.com Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 i agree with the solution of arangarajan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vappana Posted July 7, 2005 Share Posted July 7, 2005 Ans sould be 'D'. In 'A' the 3 consequtive prime numbers can be 2,3,5 or 3,5,7 that result in an avg of 5. but when we take 2,3,5 we need '7' to get an avg of '5'. '7' is another prime number and we are resticted to only 3 prime numbers. thus, we will have 3,4,5,6,7. Ans (I) is suuff. (II) is suff as per others. what is the OA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arangarajan Posted July 7, 2005 Share Posted July 7, 2005 statement 1 does not rule out the possibility of having 3,5,7,6,9 which would give a result of 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.