|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
I JUST got here.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Done with GMAT 720.
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 165
![]() |
Quote:
To put it in a better way, it is this: combinations for no 1 x combinations for no 2 X 1 (for 0) 4C1 X 3C2 = 4x 3!/2!.. or 4C2 X 2C1 4!/2! x 2 = 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
GMAT TEST EXPERTS
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 520
![]() |
Yes 56 is the correct answer.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
Get your free profile evaluation with our proprietary spider plot: http://mbachase.co/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&It emid=62 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
I JUST got here.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11
![]() |
I have just started my studies for GMAT and so this may be a trivial question. But please help me understand why this is a combination problem and not a permutation problem considering the order in which the #s come up matter. For e.g. 1220 is not the same as 1022. Combination of the #s here is the same but the order is different which, I would imagine, is a permutation problem.
|
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger