all the members

[Kumaril]

The immigration service now has the discretionary poer to keep families united even though all their members do not meet the five-year residency requirement

A.
B. not all their members meet the five-year residency requirement.
C. all their members have not met the requirement for a five year residency
D. not all their members ave resided for five years, a requirement
E. all their members have not resided for five years, as required.

Official Answer will follow. Please explain your answers

[piyusht]

B for me .

Here we are stressing upon those members who have not resided for five years, hence use of not all their instead f all their members. leaves us with B & D.

To stay for five years is the requirement hence if they are not staying for five years they are not meeting the requirement. In D, " a requirement" seems to modify five years. Hence B

[jeepee_in]

Agree with Piyush

B

[gsunder23]

"B" for me

[skumar]

to me A looks to be the Official Answer.
"All the x meet the req y" looks better than
"not all the x meet the y req"

[skumar]

Official Answer please Kumaril

[Obelixous]

B

reasons same as piyush

[geebs25]

i go with piyush as well.

[Vaithy]

I am for A

[limwd]

A for me