ss,
the use of two "it" in C, is unnecessary and looks awkward

1. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.
(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said
SPOILER: D
==========
This question is already discussed in the following link. I have hard time understanding why C is wrong. What is wrong with "it" in C ?
http://www.urch.com/forums/showthrea...+microcomputer (1 more sC)
===========
sspati

hey thanks.
I just see one problem with D; please help me understand why it is not true, if atall.
A pen is for writing - CORRECT
I picked up the pen (in order) to write - CORRECT
I picked up the pen for writing - INCORRECT
for - specifies the purpose of an object and "in order to" specifies purpose of an action.
So, D choice also uses ".. for not anticipating the impact .." - wouldn't this be wrong? If not, are my above examples wrong? If they are, pls explain why. Thank you.
~ Divine
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks