Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: rhinoceroses: whether vs. if: DETAILED explanation

  1. #1
    Eager!
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    64
    Rep Power
    12


    Good post? Yes | No
    A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

    (A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
    (B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
    (C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been
    (D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are
    (E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been


    Between C & D why is C better ?

    Is have been trimmed better than are trimmed ?


  2. #2
    Ankylosaurus Forum Admin Erin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,140
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    54


    Good post? Yes | No

    Arrow Whether vs. if

    A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

    (A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
    (B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
    (C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been
    (D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are
    (E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been


    Between C & D why is C better ?

    Is have been trimmed better than are trimmed ?

    Hi, isha!!

    First, your focus on this question is a bit off; you're missing the "elephant in the living room."

    The real focus of the question here is whether vs. if. This question comes up so much that I've come up with a little rhyme to help you remember:

    If you see "whether" and "if"...

    whether is better


    Of course, this rhyme is just to help you remember, it doesn't explain the rule.

    We use "if" for conditions: I will help you if I can.

    and for things that might happen:

    If you need a hand, please let me know.

    We use "whether" when we have two options:

    We will have the picnic whether or not it rains. (Two options: rain/no rain.)

    Another way to think of this is if we can add "or not," then we MUST use "whether." (Of course, you'll remember that GMAT does NOT like to add "or not;" GMAT considers the "or not" redundant.)

    Furthermore, in this sentence

    question... is... __________

    we are missing a noun complement.

    Strictly speaking, we should NOT use an adjective clause as a noun complement; we should use a noun clause.

    You will recall that if can NEVER be used in noun clauses (only in adverb clauses), but whether CAN be used in noun clauses.



    If we understand these rules, we can see that the following sentence (one that I would say when speaking):

    I don't know if we're having class tomorrow.

    is wrong.

    First, we have two options: class/no class, so we MUST use whether.

    Furthermore, know, a transitive verb, requires an object, and in this case, we can use a noun clause as the object.



    Finally, I really like B--I think we should trim the horns of tourists!!!



    HTH!!


    ☼ Look! urch.com
    ☼ Become a fan on Facebook: facebook.com/testmagic ☼ Follow TestMagic on Twitter: twitter.com/testmagic

  3. #3
    kav
    kav is offline
    Trying to make mom and pop proud
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    19
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No

    Why is A not an option, why B?

    Kav

  4. #4
    Eager!
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    77
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No
    i am confused too....we have chosen B over A because its clear that its rhino's horns that we are talking about ;so we need not repeat word 'rhinoceroses' as in option A. Is my explanation correct??....please reply someone

  5. #5
    Ankylosaurus Forum Admin Erin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,140
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    54


    Good post? Yes | No
    A and B are wrong because the pronoun "their" is ambiguous--does it refer to "tourists" or to "rhinoceroses?" Actually, the closer noun is "tourists," so it really seems as if "their" is referring to "tourists."

    Um, the best answer here is C; A and B are wrong. I hope my joke here didn't confuse anybody:

    Finally, I really like B--I think we should trim the horns of tourists!!!

    ☼ Look! urch.com
    ☼ Become a fan on Facebook: facebook.com/testmagic ☼ Follow TestMagic on Twitter: twitter.com/testmagic

  6. #6
    Within my grasp! sunil4gmat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Irving, USA
    Posts
    106
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No

    Re: rhinoceroses: whether vs. if: DETAILED explanation

    Hi Erin,
    I have a doubt here. You have discarded B because their is not clear what is referring to, since tourists is most near to them . But with this analogy, A cannot be discarded since Rhinoceroses is most near to them and it is making sense.
    Can u give me some more clarifications on wy C is better over A.

  7. #7
    Within my grasp! TwinnSplitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    421
    Rep Power
    10


    Good post? Yes | No

    Re: rhinoceroses: whether vs. if: DETAILED explanation

    C is better because "have been" indicates that the horns were trimmed by the time the people had come to the zoo, especially because the sentence says "after their horns"...this is most logically followed by have been. Also, the meaning of the sentence is trying to say that the people were coming specifically TO see the rhinoceroses, which is why the author has doubt regarding whether the people will still want to come once the rhinoceroses have been tainted. Thus, C also has more clarity of meaning since it uses "to see" rather than "and see".

  8. #8
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage dileepsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    682
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No
    agreed C it is
    Its not over ............until you Win.

  9. #9
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,124
    Rep Power
    13


    Good post? Yes | No
    Agreed with C.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. From Previous thread Please give detailed explanation
    By Riyad Mohammad in forum GRE Math
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2010, 04:36 PM
  2. Tough ones - detailed explanation pls
    By avinish in forum GMAT Data Sufficiency
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 08:52 PM
  3. Set 1-DS Questions.Please provide a detailed explanation
    By manotswati in forum GMAT Data Sufficiency
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 08:02 PM
  4. Detailed explanation of Answers
    By gsinha in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-05-2007, 02:50 PM
  5. Rhinoceroses
    By hitzs in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-11-2006, 06:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.