Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: study of new treatments for heart attack

  1. #1
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage DJValentino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    608
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No

    study of new treatments for heart attack

    Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for heart attack patients was extremely important but more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than the balloon procedure by itself.

    A. more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than
    B. more research was needed for determining whether or not balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than is
    C. that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than
    D. that more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was any better for heart attack patients than
    E. that more research was needed for determining that balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is or is not any better for heart attack patients than is

  2. #2
    Within my grasp! givemeanid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    461
    Rep Power
    7


    Good post? Yes | No
    C for me
    _________________
    So It Goes

  3. #3
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage LegoLife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    1,106
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No
    My answer is C.

    A. more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than
    B. more research was needed for determining whether or not balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than is
    C. that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than
    D. that more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was any better for heart attack patients than
    E. that more research was needed for determining that balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is or is not any better for heart attack patients than is
    I'm a mutant; I need exactly 800 vials to transform myself back to normalcy - else I remain a mutant.

  4. #4
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    243
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    My answer is *C* for above mentioned reasons but I don't like *but* followed by a *that*. Any views?

    Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for heart attack patients was extremely important but that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than the balloon procedure by itself.

  5. #5
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage LegoLife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    1,106
    Rep Power
    11


    Good post? Yes | No
    I think the usage of "that" is very essential and is justified.

    For example :

    Frank agreed that the money was sufficient but (agreed) that more people were required.

    "But" is a conjunction that connects two clauses that are parallel.The verb need not be repeated again in the second clause.
    I'm a mutant; I need exactly 800 vials to transform myself back to normalcy - else I remain a mutant.

  6. #6
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    243
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    Thanks a lot for superb explanation, LegoLife.

  7. #7
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    431
    Rep Power
    8


    Good post? Yes | No
    "C" it is

  8. #8
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage DJValentino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    608
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    Reference answer is B. And I agree with it too.

    The original sentence intends to compare two things:
    1. balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound
    2. the balloon procedure

    Between B & C, only B does the comparison correctly.

    Even though I don't like "for determining" and "whether or not" in B, I would still go with B since it corrects the serious error of wrong comparison.

    .....more research was needed for determining whether or not balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than is the balloon procedure by itself

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Heart Attack
    By safazal in forum GMAT Critical Reasoning
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-03-2008, 11:10 AM
  2. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-17-2008, 07:30 PM
  3. heart attack patients
    By G.Unit in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-23-2007, 05:31 AM
  4. Heart attack!
    By sam_08854 in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 04:45 AM
  5. heart attack
    By mchakrain in forum GMAT Critical Reasoning
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-17-2005, 02:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.