Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Please explain

  1. #1
    I know I can helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No

    Please explain

    Many writers of modern English have acquired careless habits that damage the clarity of their prose, but these habits can be broken if they are willing to take the necessary trouble.

    (A) but these habits can be broken
    (B) but these habits are breakable
    (C) but they can break these habits
    (D) which can be broken
    (E) except that can be broken

    Why not A?

  2. #2
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    110
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    i think its (D)..is that right? I dont think its (a) or (b) because habits is repeated twice which is redundant and could be replaced with a pronoun?

  3. #3
    Within my grasp! aikhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pakastan
    Posts
    160
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    because there is a comma just before the underlined phrase and plus which is clearly replacing the noun, furthermore but is a conjunction that is usually used to join linguistically equivalent things; that i suspect is not the case here.

  4. #4
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    962
    Rep Power
    9


    Good post? Yes | No
    IMO ans is A.

    @helix: Official Answer please

  5. #5
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage 800Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Milano
    Posts
    1,508
    Rep Power
    15


    Good post? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by helix View Post
    Many writers of modern English have acquired careless habits that damage the clarity of their prose, but these habits can be broken if they are willing to take the necessary trouble.

    (A) but these habits can be broken
    (B) but these habits are breakable
    (C) but they can break these habits
    (D) which can be broken
    (E) except that can be broken

    Why not A?
    A and B make the pronoun "they" ambiguous: does it refer to "writers" or "habits"?
    In D, "which" illogically refers to "prose".
    E makes no sense, and in any case the conjunction "except that" would need to be followed by a clause with a subject and verb, not just a verb.

    The answer is C.

  6. #6
    Within my grasp! aikhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pakastan
    Posts
    160
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    yes yes
    I agree with you

  7. #7
    Trying to make mom and pop proud notahug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 800Bob View Post
    A and B make the pronoun "they" ambiguous: does it refer to "writers" or "habits"?
    In D, "which" illogically refers to "prose".
    E makes no sense, and in any case the conjunction "except that" would need to be followed by a clause with a subject and verb, not just a verb.

    The answer is C.
    Totally agree with 800Bob

  8. #8
    Eager!
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    45
    Rep Power
    6


    Good post? Yes | No
    but in C too..they can refer too habits or writers!!! isnt it???

  9. #9
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage 800Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Milano
    Posts
    1,508
    Rep Power
    15


    Good post? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ForestGump View Post
    but in C too..they can refer too habits or writers!!! isnt it???
    The pronoun refers to the subject of the preceding clause. And furthermore, "habits" is the object of the second clause. How could the subject pronoun refer to its own object?

  10. #10
    Within my grasp! sandeep_chads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    441
    Rep Power
    8


    Good post? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by 800Bob View Post
    The pronoun refers to the subject of the preceding clause. And furthermore, "habits" is the object of the second clause. How could the subject pronoun refer to its own object?

    Hey Bob, I didn't get this:

    e.g.

    Though the police ate pies, they are not good. (can't think of fancy examples)
    Here Subject - Police
    Object = Pies

    Here, the antecedent of they is pies or police?

    I always thought the pronoun refers to the closest noun in the previous clause, but apropos your suggestion, they only refers to the subject of the previous clause. Therefore, they refers to POLICE and NOT PIES?
    Hey Harvard, I am right here!!
    rep me if I made some sense

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Please Explain
    By Atonio79 in forum GMAT Data Sufficiency
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-13-2008, 07:15 AM
  2. Please Explain
    By Atonio79 in forum GMAT Problem Solving
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-12-2008, 11:41 PM
  3. Can someone explain this one ?
    By ve_boss in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-02-2008, 10:32 PM
  4. please explain
    By priyankagre2005 in forum GRE Analogies and Antonyms
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-02-2005, 06:10 PM
  5. Explain this one
    By Synergy79 in forum GMAT Sentence Correction
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-30-2005, 05:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.