Hi everyone. I donīt whant to be boring what I do not know what to believe when scoring in test simulators.

My main question is to find out wich test preparation out there can be more reliable when an score is obtained. I know that most of you have asked this question but I think that GMATPrep is not probably useful (the verbal section is much more easier than real day, as one frien of mine told me 2 months ago when taking the GMAT...)
  • I have read in this forum that GMATPrep can be a good indicator of your real score the G-day. Consider that after 4 tests from thisd source, scores ranges from 670 to 750.
  • Princeton Review (online tests from Cracking the gmat page): 4 tests 610, 600, 610, 670
  • Kaplan (2003 verion I think): 570, 550, 560; an the CD Diagnostic 640 (after the tests, in fact)
My point is that GMATPrep cannot be a good indicator since around 11 wrong questions give you a 690 or above 700, and Princeton Revies (not as hard as Kaplan) 5 wrongs in each question is around 670.
Kaplan is another league, and I think as most of you that is goods to practice more than rely oin scoring results....

Well, what to believe? How do you know if you are prepared enought to be aroun 700+? Any experience?


Thanks!