Head-to-Head Analysis: Veritas Prep versus Manhattan GMAT
I found that some people who are looking into GMAT prep courses often ask for the differences between these two courses. I have actually taken both courses and have written a pretty comprehensive head-to-head analysis between them. You can find it here:
had a horrible experience with Veritas, very basic training, no strategy whatsoever, poor instructor, BETTER CHECK instructor's 99 percentile.....Ask them to show the score report period. If you are spending $1500 they better give you what they claim...
Hi v-rap. I completely understand your frustration and am sorry that you had a poor experience with Veritas. I also share many of your concerns and was hoping to quantify it in my analysis. Since you have also taken Veritas, I would love to get your feedback, given you have the time to read it!
Dear Clockwork - It's obvious that you are trying to ad Veritas...Please stop it.
I am coming back after almost a year and want to tell you Veritas "SUCKS" NO VALUE FOR MONEY.
Friends - If you are really serious of getting 650+ score, don't take Veritas, It can help you 500+ not beyond 600, I had bad experience. I wish I could have saved $1500.
Beware, they have old obsolute stuff with no help.
I would advise to study og11 this will by itself cover twice veritas. And do lot of practice exams. I feel Manhattan are more into the grove of latest stuff and will definitely help.
This is my personal opinion - pls do your own analysis.