Jump to content
Urch Forums

please rate my issue essay


inthesun

Recommended Posts

Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.

Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.

 

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

 

 

my response

 

 

art is integral part of our lives.it is through art artists convey their diverse emotions.Difference in creative thinking

gives rise to different forms of art.There are various forms of art prevalent in the world.

every nation has its own culture and art depicts the culture of a nation.government has to protect art there by its

culture by providing funds to various forms of art.Government has to support art so that it becomes available to all kinds

of people even penury ones. government has to support artists who needs financial help and

has to support every form of art and see that no kind of art becomes extinct.

 

 

art is an integral part of every nation.art depicts the culture of nation.we can preserve our culture and traditions through art

hence government has to allocate sufficient funds for the development of art and artists.government has to encourage the young people for

the development of art.if sufficient finance is not available for young people they shift their life goals to other departments . many of younger people

doesn't pursue their passion because of financial problems .for example one friend of mine who has interest in music cannot follow his passion because of financial problems in his family.such people need support from the government .therefore it is responsibility of government provide sufficient funds for those young people there by encouraging them to carry on their passion and also choose arts as their professional carrier.

 

 

 

In addition to encouraging younger generations for the development of arts government also has to corroborate those artforms which are on the verge of

extinction. pottery and many small scale industries like handloom industry are typical example for artforms which are dying.for many people these small

scale industries are main sources of their income.due to the advent of newer technology handloom industry has gone down and many artists who rely on these artforms has lost their livelihood. reasonable person might ask why should government support these artforms when newer technology can produce the output much faster and much more efficiently?.even though machines can produce the output faster they cannot replace the humans.afterall machines are developed by humans .

humans can think more eficiently and creatively than machines.for example in india the sarees made by hand are more famous than those made by the machines

hence government has to support these artforms for not only to support those people who rely on these artforms but also to support the art itelf.

 

 

however artists involve in a highly creative process and what they want is audience who can think like them and who can appreciate their art

no artist just works for money.no dancer dances on the stage just for money, dancing is their passion and what they want is audience who can support them.

leonordo da vanci is a great artist and he continued to work even though he did not receive any financial support from the governmment.art continue to exist whether government support it or not.however government support is needed for those artforms which are becoming extinct and also has to see that art is available to all kinds of people. government should also support all forms of art without any prejudices.it should not fund only those arts which favour the government.for example the government of soviet union during civil war has supported only those painting which support them and prevented those which are against the government.this behaviour of government threatens the integrity of art.so government should support every form of art without any prejudices.

 

 

 

finally the government should support all forms of art without any prejudices.supporting one art for its own interest and restraining the other affects the integrity

of art.government should bolster those arts which are on the verge of extinction and also support the younger generation in following their passions and choosing art

as their profesional carrier

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...