Jump to content
Urch Forums

Essay - the best ideas arise from interesent on commonplace things


meneldur

Recommended Posts

I' d love your opinions:

 

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.

 

Truly, the best findings, ideas and inventions are distiguished not only by the simplicity intrisic to them, but also their commonplance origins: what motivated and gave foundation to their creation. The examples are everywhere, in every field of science and arts, and populate our entire history.

 

Everything that is "commonplace", by definition, is often overlooked and interpreted superficially by people. They focus their interest and their critical abilities in more elaborate, complicated things. This focus gives birth to inventions, patents, products, literature, art; products of the human mind, that somehow express, or are the product of an idea. This idea is rooted on this elaborated and complicated concepts, and therefore its result will probably be equally complicated and, consequently, prone to failure. Not just operational types of failure, as is happens with a machine, but also aesthetical, estilistical, theoretical failures; truly, any kind of it. And sometimes these results have a diminute applicability, making them interesting only to a very small number of people. However, when these ideas are rooted in simpler concepts and phenomenons, they tend to produce equally simpler and more ellegant, functional, applicable results that arise from this simplicity and generality.

 

One classic example in science is the discovery of the gravitational law, by Newton. He started from something as simple as an apple falling from a tree. Really, what could be more commonplace than this? Nevertheless, he was able to transcend the obviety of this phenomenon and unveil the working force behind it, giving birth to one of the most important law in modern physics.

 

Another example, this time from literature. A famous brazilian poet once wrote a poem about a rock in the middle of a path. It's a six verse poem which repeats continously "there was a rock in the middle of a path", using small variations of syntax and punctuation. Trivial as it might seem, this poem is considered a true literary masterpiece, a monument of brazilian poetry.

 

The invention of the airplane is also a great example. Its inventors took inspiration not from complex laws of hydraulics, but something as ordinary as the flight of birds. They spent hours observing birds, analyzing their flight patterns, their wing movements, and waiting for an inspiration to come. Well, it eventually came and gave birth to a whole new age of world transportation.

 

These examples show that some of the best ideas and inventions of our history are rooted in simplicity. Their authors started by observing common natural phenomenons or reflecting about commonplace conceptions, but they showed the world that the apparently ordinary can transform itself into something great and beautiful, like a pupe into a butterfly. In an increasingly complicated world, where everything valuable appears to derive from complexity and intricacy, perhaps we should take a better look at those simple, commonplace things that we so often take for granted. The answers we are looking to solve our problems might just be inside them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

found an essay on the web that had been rated 6 for the same

 

Even the most brilliant thinkers, from Socrates to Satre, live lives in time. A childhood, an adolescence, an adulthood; these are common to me and you as well as the greatest writers. Furthermore, many of the great thinkers we esteem in our Western culture lived somewhat unevetful lives. What distinguished their life from say a common laborer was their work. Therefore, what provided the grist for their work? One might say that they were brilliant and this alone was sufficient to distinguish their lives from the masses. Intellect alone can not devise situations or thoughts from no where; there must be a basis and that basis is most common, if not always, observation of the common, of the quotidian. Critics of this idea may argue that these thinkers were products of fine educations and were well schooled in the classics. This, they may point to, is the real basis for their knowledge. I would agrue that although it may be a benefit to study classics and be well schooled in diverse disciplines, these pursuits merely refine and hone an ability each and every person has, the ability to study human nature. Where best to study human nature than in the day to day routine each one of us can witness in him or herself or those around us.

 

I propose that the two best disciplines to understand this power of the commonplace and its ability to cause a groundswell of thought are philosophy and literature. Every school of philosophy, from the Greeks to our day, share a common mission or intent and that is to understand and explain human existence, with all of its concommitant features. Generally speaking, the Greek philosophers, epitomized in Aristotle, attempted to set down rules for human behavior founded on logic. These rules applied not only to the rare forms of human behavior but largely focused on the more mundane motions of daily life. Many of Aristotle’s rules were based on his observations of others as well as himself. Contrast this venture with the existentialists of our century who attempted to look behind the real motivations of human behavior as well understand man’s relation to the Universe. To do this, what did these philosophers do? They studied those around them; they submerged themselves in the commonplace, in cities with hordes of annonymous people. While the existentialists, as well those philosophers before, exploited their uncommon eduation and intellect, the basis for their movement was ordinary human behavior and existence.

 

Finally, literature is similar to philosophy in that it seeks to explain and understand human behavior and therefore rooted in the commonplace. Nevertheless, its relative strength over philosophy is literature’s ability to emotionally and spiritually move the reader through the use of contrived situations and fictional characters. It can do this when even the central theme of a piece maybe love between a man and a woman (e.g.commonplace). Literature also distinguishes itself from philosophy in that the breadth of the fiction may be huge. The plot and the detail can be quite ordinary or fanatastic. However, this does not mean that the central themes of all literature, whether ordinary or fantastic, deal with human beings and the problems they find in the world, something which we all share.

 

In conclusion, I hope it has been shown that a passionate desire to understand and explain human behavior, the significance of our existence and deal constructively with the challanges of life are the centerpieces of at least in two of the most influential areas in human thought. What is more commonplace than the existence of man.

 

****************Credits to the orginal author****************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...