|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 218
![]() |
It would seem that absolute qualities in art _______ us, that we cannot escape viewing works of art in ____ of time and circumstance.
a) enlighten ... a pattern b) frighten ... an absence c) confuse ... a welter d) delude ... a context e) deceive ... a mileu As the creation of new knowledge through science has become ___, resistance to innovation has become less_____, taking the form of intertia rather than direct attack. a) controversial .. sporadic b) institutionalized .. aggressive c) essential .. effective d) public .. circumspect e) suspect .. lively |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 971
![]() |
1. E : The keyword is absolute here. Except one choice, all the other choices (first blanks) have negative charges. Hence, the OA will also have a negative charge in the first blank.
So, the SC says that absolute qualities in art does something negative to us which is why we cannot help but view it in a *dash* of time and circumstances. Therefore, what is not absolute is relative. The word milieu fits in here perfectly. That is, something which is relative is generally seen from a fulcrum or fixed point in time and space. So, if absolute qualities deceive or evade us it seems likely that we cannot help but view them in a milieu (environment or setting) of time and circumstances D is pretty close too !! But, I thought that E sounded better. This is a toughie !! 2. B : Look at the second blank. If something has become more like inertia rather than direct attack then it means that the resistance has become less effective or less aggressive. However, B matches more in the first blank, that is if the creation of knowledge has become standardized or structured then that means that resistance will become less aggressive. Whilst C is feasible, taken together, the words do not quite fit, that is, if creation of knowledge becomes essential, then resistance is less effective. Logically this does not make too much sense. Less effective is to reduce in quality, the magnitude of something. Less Aggressive is to tone down the magnitude, but not the quality. There is a subtle difference there. But, I could be wrong. What are the OAs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 124
![]() |
Quote:
1. D seems more fitting than E because of the second word. Context aptly conveys the meaning than milieu.Besides "milieu of time and circumstance" is an awkward construction. 2. C is better than B because something that becomes essential will rarely be resisted and even if resisted is not likely to create an huge impact because people need it. I don't understand how institutionalize something can affect resistance. I don't see a compelling relation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 124
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive
Link to TestMagic
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
Partner Sites:
GMAT Sentence Correction
SAT 2400
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 1998-2008 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger