|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Shooting Star
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 464
![]() |
Re: Are archaic/obsolete definitions tested?
I think pretty much all definitions of a word can be tested- its important to know all contexts a word can be used in...
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
To realize one's destiny is a person's only obligation-from 'The Alchemist'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
So many things to do...
Forum Admin
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 8,307
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Are archaic/obsolete definitions tested?
I haven't had official word from GRE, but I cannot imagine that archaic and obsolete definitions could be tested. The point of the vocab sections (analogies, antonyms, sentence completions) is to gauge one's familiarity with written English, not one's knowledge of the history of the English language.
I vaguely recall reading something official about this years ago, but it's been so long I can't remember anymore. Anyway, I just can't imagine that these definitions would be tested, and to be honest, I'd be very surprised if any obsolete or archaic senses appeared in anything official. |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 1998-2008 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger