In the book of Genesis, God decreed that there were limits to growth by never allowing the Tower of Babel to reach the sky. <font color="orange">In modern times, the task of delineating human aspirations fell to the Club of Rome, which in its 1972 study, Limits to Growth, declared that in a world of finite resources, unlimited economic expansion and prosperity are impossible to pursue. </font id="orange">
So now we know what the author is going to talk about.
The international scientists, who at the invitation of Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei came together in the late 1960s to form the Club of Rome, <font color="orange">meant well</font id="orange">.
The phrase meant well signals two things. Firstly, the author has some sympathy for the Club of Rome. Secondly, the scientists' are probably mistaken. This is what I mean by identifying the tone of voice. They were united by their conviction that enormous ecological problems faced humankind and called for extraordinary political measures. <font color="orange">At the time of its release, Limits to Growth had a profound impact, spawning alarmist headlines such as “A Computer Looks Ahead and Shudders” and “Scientists Warn of Global Catastrophe.” The subsequent 1973 oil crisis, prompted in part by the Arab embargo, made the study seem eerily prescient.</font id="orange">
The author provides evidence to show why the club thought the way it did.
<font color="orange">But</font id="orange">
That's the twister 30 years later, the Club of Rome’s most dire forecasts have failed to come true. Vital minerals such as gold, silver, copper, tin, zinc, mercury, lead, tungsten, and oil should have been exhausted by now. But they aren’t. Due to an exponential increase in population growth, the world should be facing desperate shortages of arable land and rising food prices. Yet food prices have never been lower. And the world’s health should have been undermined by an exponential increase in pollution. People today, however, live longer than ever before, and in Western cities, most pollutants are on the decline, driven down by technological advances and environmental legislation.
The author provides a volume of evidence contrary to the original argument.
Bookmarks