|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
just trying
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
![]() |
Is there such a thing as less math-intensive programs?
Are there any non top-20 programs that have slightly less focus on math or are less math-intensive? I thought I recalled reading on this topic about a year ago....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 499
![]() |
These programs would generally be labeled as heterodox economics (outside of the mainstream). There are a few schools I can think of, UMass, Utah, George Mason (somewhat).....but it is important to note that if you go that route, your job prospects will generally be limited to those types of schools.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
UT Austin Entering Class of 2009 ![]() Do you like fishsticks??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Click My Avatar!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,210
![]() ![]() |
I imagine that some schools are less math intensive than others. For instance, I doubt the programs outside of the top 100 are as math intensive as top 5 programs (although you'd still need to be fairly comfortable with math at programs outside the top 100).
Some fields are less math intensive than others. Note however that you will still need to take the first year core courses and still have to pass prelims. Heterodox economics is less math intensive than mainstream economics. I can't comment on all schools, but at least at George Mason even if you're interested in heterodox economics you'll still be expected to take the first year core and pass prelims. In this interesting podcast Boettke on Austrian Economics | EconTalk | Library of Economics and Liberty Pete Boettke discusses Austrian economics. Boettke states something along the lines of, "Modern day Austrian economists take the same first year courses as all economists and are as influenced by Alchian and Samuelson as Hayek and Von Mises." I'm not sure if this statement applies to all heterodox economists or just Austrians. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 124
![]() |
Just a question about the very definition of heterodox economics. What about all these heterogenous agent models and "econphysics"? If I am not wrong, they count to heterodox economic models as well, don't they? If so, this stuff is even more mathematical than standard economics. A reason might be that it is normally done by mathematicians and physicists.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
Please correct any mistakes in my English grammar, spelling or expression. I would highly appreciate this! |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger