|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
nervous
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 86
![]() |
Would this suggest a net decrease in competition? Assuming that the distribution of who applied last year but aren't this year is concentrated at the top, at least...
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
Research Interests: applied micro (esp. public econ and labor econ) Applying to: {MIT, Berkeley, Harvard, Princeton, UMich, Stanford, UChicago, Yale, Northwestern, UPenn, Columbia, Columbia, NYU} |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 632
![]() |
What I meant is that due to the gruelling nature of last year's cycle, there are a lot of good applicants out there who have had a year to polish their applications - improve their letter of reference's, nail their statement of purpose, take extra math, and research other possible schools. I know I have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
nervous
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 86
![]() |
We all know what Pareto optimality means... but how about Jesus-optimal allocation? That's when one person is made *really* worse off... but everyone else is much better off...
(from http://orion.it.luc.edu/~twren/econjoke.htm )
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
Research Interests: applied micro (esp. public econ and labor econ) Applying to: {MIT, Berkeley, Harvard, Princeton, UMich, Stanford, UChicago, Yale, Northwestern, UPenn, Columbia, Columbia, NYU} |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger