Yeah #3 sounds optimal. Working on a textbook is going to be of limited value, in all likelihood.
I think that at this point it's premature to consider yourself a "micro person," particularly if your only exposure to macro has been at the undergraduate level. In any event, at this point your objective should be more about seeing how academic research is undertaken rather than developing your own research skills (it's great if you can do that, but that's a secondary objective). If your best opportunity is to work with a macroeconomist, then I'd try to learn as much as possible, which means approaching it with the right attitude (e.g., not "should I just shut up and help him with macro?"). Even if you do go onto micro, working on that project can be a valuable learning opportunity in its own right, not just a signalling exercise.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks







Reply With Quote

Bookmarks