Sponsored Ad:
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Real Analysis for admissions vs 1st year survival - myths and realities

  1. #1
    Trying to make mom and pop proud
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    1


    Good post? Yes | No

    Real Analysis for admissions vs 1st year survival - myths and realities

    Sponsored Ad:
    I followed this forum very closely last year and was led to believe real analysis is the do or die of phd first year econ.

    I feel I should give some new observations give one semester a a good phd program in the US. RA is useful, for first year micro, but you can learn how to wrote proofs and follow the definition-theorem-proof approach without RA as well (sure it will make life harder, but by no means is it impossible if you put in the hours and dedication - at the end of the day its just learning a new technique).

    While proof writing is important, my view is being completely comfortable with math stat & linear algebra and being able to solve large systems of equations (particularly macro) or complex functions is equally - if not more - important.

    RA serves as a signal for admissions but if anyone tells you you cant survive a good phd program without RA they're deluded. At the end of the day its about being able to put in the hours and remaining dedicated during the tough times. The rest falls into place.

  2. #2
    Within my grasp!
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    155
    Rep Power
    3


    Good post? Yes | No

    Re: Real Analysis for admissions vs 1st year survival - myths and realities

    The purpose of taking analysis is for its signaling ability, apart from gaining maturity in mathematical logic. Tough math courses are seen as a good signal since adcoms will rather take in students who have proven that they can cope with mathematical rigour and then not use them (if they've decided to not go down the theory route), rather than a poorly (with respect to math) prepared student. As always, more is better than less when it comes to PhD admissions.

    Most good schools explicitly mentioned on their website that good candidates should have a year of calc, algebra and have some exposure to mathematical analysis. Plus, they almost always mention that more math is preferred.

  3. #3
    Trying to make mom and pop proud
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    17
    Rep Power
    1


    Good post? Yes | No

    Re: Real Analysis for admissions vs 1st year survival - myths and realities

    Honestly, I've never heard anyone say you can't survive a good phd program without RA. Do people really say that? Also, counterfactual? How can you measure how hard it would've been without RA. Saying that it's not impossible doesn't provide much insight since the reality is we have constraints (24 hours in 1 day).

  4. #4
    TestMagic Guru Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,681
    Rep Power
    20


    Good post? Yes | No

    Re: Real Analysis for admissions vs 1st year survival - myths and realities

    Who led you to believe that? Do you have examples?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-05-2014, 12:01 AM
  2. What does "Real analysis" mean?? Is it 1 year course?
    By woowl2 in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-19-2012, 10:09 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-14-2010, 10:06 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-13-2007, 08:29 AM
  5. Waiting a year, differential equations, and real analysis. Advice
    By ambitiousandstupid in forum PhD in Economics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 10:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •