|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Trying to make mom and pop proud
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10
![]() |
heterodox economics and top 20 phd programs
I'm finishing up a masters in economics and am seriously considering pursuing a phd thereafter. However, I'm finding myself less and less enamored with the neoclassical approach. My question is: is it possible to attend a top 20 PhD program and still specialize in a field that is a little off the beaten path?
I know that behavioral economics has gained a lot of acceptance (maybe it's a misnomer calling it heterodox anymore) and places like Berkeley and University of Chicago (or at least its business school) are great for that (although extraordinarily difficult to get into). Does anyone have any vague idea of what the top schools are good for behavioral? I suppose I was also wondering about things like evolutionary economics and institutional economics (or even new-institutional although I guess this isn't really heterodox). Are any top programs strong in these fields? Would it be worthwhile trying to get into a top program if I am looking to conduct research that is a little heterodox in flavor (excluding behavioral and new-institutional)? Or is it a better idea to go to a specifically heterodox program or try to get a Phd in Business, where I gather there is a bit more diversity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 607
![]() ![]() |
The evolutionary game theory approach used to be much more widespread than it is now. It sorta fell out of favor and is now being used primarily by biologists. David Levine who is now at WUSTL seems pretty sympathetic to this approach, so WUSTL might be worth considering.
For behavioral, Caltech would be a great place to be. There are also a lot of people at Harvard doing behavioral, so that might be worth considering as well. There is a professor at UCLA, Earl Thompson, (http://www.econ.ucla.edu/thompson/) who does a lot of non-mainstream work in economics. He has a lot of unpublished papers that he is compiling into a three volume collection. As long as Earl doesn't retire in the next few years, UCLA could be a solid choice for you. In any case, good luck!
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
MIT Economics, class of 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Eager!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Trying to make mom and pop proud
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10
![]() |
Sorry poleringer, I really don't know, but that's a good question. I only mentioned University of Chicago's business school because Richard Thaler is there along with the Center for Decision Research. Then again maybe you can get him as an advisor even if you're in the normal econ phd program...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Trying to make mom and pop proud
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1
![]() |
heterodox approaches
If you haven't yet read the article "Taking on Rational Man" in the Chronicle of Higher Education, then definitely take a look:
http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i20/20a01201.htm The program in sociological economics at Cornell might be just the thing you're looking for, if you decide your tastes run too far towards the heterodox to be easily included within traditional economics departments. And their placement record looks quite good. http://www.soc.cornell.edu/research/...ociology.shtml |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive
Link to TestMagic
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
Partner Sites:
GMAT Sentence Correction
SAT 2400
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 1998-2008 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger