Jump to content
Urch Forums

What does a "lukewarm" letter of recom usually mean?


jjmann

Recommended Posts

We always hear that "lukewarm" letters are not good and should avoid it at all possible costs... but what does a lukewarm letter usually mean? Can anyone give an example or idea of what will be the contents of a lukewarm letter? or how it might sound like? if someone has 2 very good leteters and 1 good letter, then will that 1 good letter become a lukewarm letter?

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The definition of "lukewarm" imho should depend on what kind of school you're trying to get into, though I don't think people tend to think about it that way.

 

But try to get into a really great school, and letters like this look bad: "X was my student in A, B and C, and I supervised his thesis. [insert some details.] X is very intelligent and hard-working and probably in the upper 20-30% of his class." (I'd expect you'd need a prof to think you better than just that kind of percentile, I mean!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The definition of "lukewarm" imho should depend on what kind of school you're trying to get into, though I don't think people tend to think about it that way.

 

But try to get into a really great school, and letters like this look bad: "X was my student in A, B and C, and I supervised his thesis. [insert some details.] X is very intelligent and hard-working and probably in the upper 20-30% of his class." (I'd expect you'd need a prof to think you better than just that kind of percentile, I mean!)

 

 

I would agree with Karina. Most schools' recommendation forms ask the prof to rate you relative to other students, whether that means you are upper 20-30%, best in your class, best in 5 years, or best in 2 decades. The significance of these ratings varies a lot based on where you studied for undergrad as well as the institution to which you are applying. I went to a top 25 public, top 40 econ school. For top 15 or 20 apps, I'd say a lukewarm rec for me would be something like "he was in the top 10% of his class". I think I'd really need a "Best I've had in years" or "As good as my former student, who is succeeding at school Y's PhD program." But obviously, if I had gone to say MIT, and Daron Acemoglu is writing my letter, then "Best I've had in years" is probably not a lower bound for a successful application.

 

Basically, this a really long-winded way of saying that what is and is not lukewarm is relative. I think the consensus on this board is that to figure out the "temperature" of the letter, you ought to simultaneously ask where that prof thinks you ought to be applying.

 

-----------------------------------------

Common Tragedies--An environmental economics blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But try to get into a really great school, and letters like this look bad: "X was my student in A, B and C, and I supervised his thesis. [insert some details.] X is very intelligent and hard-working and probably in the upper 20-30% of his class." (I'd expect you'd need a prof to think you better than just that kind of percentile, I mean!)

 

If instead the quoted percentile would be "in the upper 5%" of his class, would that be a good letter now, instead of lukewarm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what is a professor supposed to say then other than he is one my best student, and such and such? With all the work that professors have to do, do you guys really beleive they will spend hours trying to write a somewhat unique letter.

 

As I was a theoretical physics major, one my recommender told me that in the letter he wrote me, he said that he pretty much talked about the project I did in his course, computational physics. He compared my final project with that of the other students and said that I finished the project earlier than everyone else and that it was the best one. Of course he said other things, but that was the main highlight of the letter. Is such letter a "lukewarm#?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I worried about the whole percent issue. I took real analysis with 25 students. About 20 were math majors (maybe 15+ considering math for grad school), 4 were grad students, some in engineering (1 was an econ phd student, my former TA), and me. I was the only "applied math" undergrad as the "pure math" kids liked to call me.

 

Both quarters I was ranked 7-10 in the class. He handed out rankings twice midway through the courses. Both quarters I got an A-. Should I be expected to compete with 20 math majors in their senior year when most had already had 5-8 upper division proof-based courses in abstract algebra, linear algebra, differential equations, or topology. I had ONE upper division course under my belt when I started real analysis: intro linear algebra.

 

My professor knew I was there for econ and he knew I was less prepared than most there. Even if he qualifies his statement and says something like, "He was the top 30% of the class despite such and such disadvantages."

 

Will Harvard give a crap or will they just think, "potential? maybe. but here's another kid who got the A."

 

I don't know the answer.

 

EDIT: Since it was over a year ago I had forgotten. I never finished the pre-reqs for Real Analysis. I had to ask the professor to let me in. I actually finished the last pre-req course one quarter after I finished real analysis. Is that worth mentioning in a statement of purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am from India and whilst asking my professors for recommendations, I had asked them to write in sufficient detail and had given the recommendation evaluation form that most schools have where they give directions to the letter writers.

 

I saw my own recommendations where all 3 of my professors have said that I was one of the best in research ability in their careers and definitely in the top 2-5% (this varies from professor to professor) (My class rank is top 2%)

 

They also went into great detail about my class ranking, percentage, course load, projects, research papers and other extra curricular activities. They also attached brief biography's and courses which I have taken of themselves (at my request) so that they adcoms can judge that these professors are experienced hands at teaching in a good school.

 

Are these lukewarm letters for good schools? Actually, I have no way to judge because we don't have this system here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ancalagon, your letters obviously cannot be called lukewarm -- they are filled with superlatives. However, depending on where in India you are applying from, your letter-writers may be completely unknown to the adcoms. This would probably result in some deflation when your letters are being interpreted.

 

Are your letter-writers economists? letters from non-economists are typically disregarded -- i have even been told by people on adcoms that they simply do not read letters by non-economists. are your letter writers able to compare you with others who have gone on to top departments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

out of curiosity

 

say, if a pretty famous prof in top5-6 department said that X is one of the best students in econ department (top 1-2%) and I believe that X will place in the top quarter of the best Phd programs. that's all the prof said in a very terse letter (about 8-10 lines). Is it considered a lukewarm letter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

out of curiosity

 

say, if a pretty famous prof in top5-6 department said that X is one of the best students in econ department (top 1-2%) and I believe that X will place in the top quarter of the best Phd programs. that's all the prof said in a very terse letter (about 8-10 lines). Is it considered a lukewarm letter?

 

 

I think the adcoms will be more interested in knowing why the famous prof thinks the student is brilliant. Remember, the adcoms are not only looking for great students, they are also looking for people who are nice match. They are also trying to figure out why that student is unique. Suppose the prof says he got highest in two of my classes... that might not be enough, if the prof does not mention anything about research skills... afterall thats what you are going to do and learn in grad school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

out of curiosity

 

say, if a pretty famous prof in top5-6 department said that X is one of the best students in econ department (top 1-2%) and I believe that X will place in the top quarter of the best Phd programs. that's all the prof said in a very terse letter (about 8-10 lines). Is it considered a lukewarm letter?

 

No, this would be strong letter. You would probably want to supplement it with more detailed letters, though -- i.e. letters that speak to the personal and research skills that Bayern refers to.

 

Economists are well-known for writing terse letters. There is a lot of information in the fact that you were in the top 2% in a top university, and that you are predicted to be in the top quarter of harvard students (if admitted) by a professor who knows what that means. congratulations!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

savingtheplanet:

 

Actually, I am from an undergraduate business program - a good university in India - not an IIT (ranked just after them though) because they don't have undergraduate business. Only one of my professors is an economist but he is a pretty well known economist in India (from Delhi School of Economics) One professor is from information technology and the other is from civil engineering. (all solid professors with plenty of research experience, meaning that they are pretty aged people :D)

 

I am not even applying to economics programs. I am applying to PhD in Information Systems in bschools/ischools. I just frequent this forum because interesting topics are discussed and my research interests right now are in the economics of information systems.

 

I do have 3 publications in business economics and environmental economics though. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Here is an example of a lukewarm letter

 

I have known Mr.X since DATE when he attended my course in COURSE NAME. Apart from passing the final (written) exam, in UNIVERSITY NAME students in COURSE NAME

(mainly the most interested and active ones during the lectures) are required to form groups, do

presentations in class on the current economic events of an assigned area of the world and finally

prepare a written paper due the date of the exam. The paper is usually referred to the current events

of the assigned area or is related to some recent theoretical developments in FIELD

although investigated with appropriate undergraduate tools. Mr. X prepared a good final paper

together with other students. The weekly reports by NAME were interesting and well-presented

with thorough descriptions of the current events. He passed the final exam with an excellent grade

(equivalent to A), although initially he showed some difficulties.

 

During the preparation of his undergraduate dissertation, Mr. X arranged a few

appointments with me since he wanted to talk about his ideas and development of his thesis. I have

been struck by the assertiveness and the passion for economics Mr. X has. I think they are

important qualities for a perspective graduate student. His relationships with other students were

excellent and his English proficiency was well above the average in my classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the programs stressing math proficiency, I find it hard to believe that a strong LOR from my real analysis prof would be discounted.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Given that his LOR is strong I think it will benefit your application rather hurt you.Actually ,many people mostly coming from US unis do have as a 3rd referee a maths professor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an example of a lukewarm letter

 

I have known Mr.X since DATE when he attended my course in COURSE NAME. Apart from passing the final (written) exam, in UNIVERSITY NAME students in COURSE NAME

(mainly the most interested and active ones during the lectures) are required to form groups, do

presentations in class on the current economic events of an assigned area of the world and finally

prepare a written paper due the date of the exam. The paper is usually referred to the current events

of the assigned area or is related to some recent theoretical developments in FIELD

although investigated with appropriate undergraduate tools. Mr. X prepared a good final paper

together with other students. The weekly reports by NAME were interesting and well-presented

with thorough descriptions of the current events. He passed the final exam with an excellent grade

(equivalent to A), although initially he showed some difficulties.

 

During the preparation of his undergraduate dissertation, Mr. X arranged a few

appointments with me since he wanted to talk about his ideas and development of his thesis. I have

been struck by the assertiveness and the passion for economics Mr. X has. I think they are

important qualities for a perspective graduate student. His relationships with other students were

excellent and his English proficiency was well above the average in my classes.

 

I won't go into the details, but this definitely looks like a 'lukewarm'-ish LOR to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
A couple of interesting websites with examples of what bad letters look like, and ideas (for letter-writers) about how they can be made better: Michigan (med school); Brown (comp sci); Washington (also comp sci). None of these is for economics, but I found them quite insightful nonetheless. At the very least, they helped me to figure out which potential letter-writers are actually capable of writing the "good" kind (in terms of what they know about me, etc.).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...