|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 183
![]() |
Notacolor, I greatly appreciate your post. I think it adds a tinge of personal touch to this place. Not to mention that you have been around for as long as I can remember and I think we might have exchanged greetings in other posts (although you might not remember me). Good luck with everything....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 630
![]() ![]() |
imagine: I realized that in my free time during undergrad, I was reading social-science-y stuff, mostly urban planning-related. And while I enjoyed science, I just couldn't see myself doing it for the rest of my life, so it seemed like a good idea to go with the field I enjoyed learning about more.
I considered going into urban planning, but econ's quantitative emphasis really appealed to me. At first I figured that even if I decided that I really didn't want to go into economics, the MA would be useful in other social sciences if I wanted to switch. And now I'm still not entirely sure if I may end up doing this, but I could always do more urban-flavored econ. But other parts of applied micro are catching my attention these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 630
![]() ![]() |
Olm: My main point is that that's not the end of the world! If you can find a smaller, less prestigious program that is a great fit for you, it can turn out really well. Certainly, when you take a broader view, it can turn out much better than going to a "better" program that isn't a good fit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
TestMagic Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,369
![]() |
Quote:
Me personally, sometimes I really care about the rankings and obsess about what I need to do in order to go to a solid program (which for me would be in the 25 - 35 range). Other times I could care less, and just want to go somewhere I enjoy living and study econ. I know a lot of you people on this forum want to become a top notch academic at a top 30 program, so I definitely understand why you want (more like need) to go to a top 5 program. Me on the other hand, I just want to be knowledgeable about economics and plan on hitting the private sector once I get my degree. So in my case the differences between my top programs (25 - 35) and my lower ranked programs (50 - 70) is not going to be as dramatic in my career options. Maybe I am wrong here, but this is my impression. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Requiem for a Dream
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 841
![]() |
You are right, YE. If you are going into the private sector, your skillset matters most. Sure, the brand name will help you land the interview, but there are tons of people with fancy degrees who don't know their *** from their elbow.
I want to be an academic/professor, so rank is important for me, at least initially. |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive
Link to TestMagic
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
Partner Sites:
GMAT Sentence Correction
SAT 2400
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 1998-2008 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger