|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 529
![]() |
On becoming and influencial researcher
Julianne Dalcanton has an interesting post over at Cosmic Variance about the development of PhD students (albeit in physics) into productive faculty.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,150
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting post.
I'd also highlight using novel methods in addition to just novel data... namely novel methods that open up your ability to address some interesting question. And # of interesting papers I'd say are clearly more important than timely papers or quantity (well I'd say timeliness can contribute to a topic being interesting, but it's neither necessary nor sufficient) I don't think recognition when co-authoring is as potentially troublesome as in pure sciences, where you more often have long lists of authors. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger