|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Trying to make mom and pop proud
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 22
![]() |
Hello everybody!
There are the sentences from TOEFL practice book: It is necessary to put a return address that included your name, street number, city, state, and zip code on all correspondence. It's clear that " included" should be " includes", but the word " necessary" give an in idea about subjunctive mode. Because of it, we should use " put" instead of " to put". But it must be only one mistake in the sentence. The next confusing sentence: Although there are approximately 120 intensive language institutes in the United States in 1970, there are more than three times as many now. Main clause starts with " there are". But, what's the subject for main clause? Also, to compare we have to use " as many as". ...,there are institutes more than three times as many as it was... I need an explanation. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2002
Location: India
Posts: 902
![]() |
Hello Igor,
Quote:
Quote:
so, the subject of the main clause must be "intensive language institutes". When "as many as" is used, the structure should be ... "There are more than three times as many intensive language institutes in the United States now as there were in 1970." "as many as" is sometimes used to intensify the quantity. e.g., The king had as many as five wives. and finally the correction in the scentence should be ... Quote:
Raghuveer. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2002
Location: India
Posts: 902
![]() |
Hello there again,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any one wanna comment ![]() Raghuveer. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Trying to make mom and pop proud
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 22
![]() |
Hello everybody!
Thanks for answering my questions. In the sentence about " language institutions" there is the clue, " … in 1970.", that leads us directly to simple past tense. We can change " there are " to " there were " without reading the rest of the sentence. Therefore, my question is mostly about style of this sentence. When is it appropriate to use a main clause without a clear subject? In our case the main clause is "there are more than three times as many now". Thanks. |
|
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive
Link to TestMagic
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
Partner Sites:
GMAT Sentence Correction
SAT 2400
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 1998-2008 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger