Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!
21 persons viewed this topic & no one wrote a word !!
This means that the forum is going in a good way of selfishness even in opinions![]()
Hello everybody,
I have just an inquiry ---->
Is the method of answering the inegrated readin & lestining quistion in long man CD , is it good way in answering this kind ?
For those who don't know the method of longman it is like the Following:
In this set of materials, The reading passage about...........& the lestining passage about ................ ( a topic about each passage)
In the reading passage ...... ( discribe the passage) ...........
...................................
In the lestining passage ......... ( discribe the passage ) .............
..............
Since I don't use Longman, I'm not sure about a format Longman suggesting. But, for me, the format described in your message is a bit long to speak everything in a minute and maybe confusing for a listener. I read somewhere saying that, for the integrated speaking questions, a test taker should talk about Listening part more than Reading part because most actions/points being asked are in Listening part. I did a bit of research to come up with my own guideline (because I choke a lot when it comes to an exam). Here is an example for "article vs lecture" question:
1. According to the article (...brief summary).
2. However, a speaker claims that the article is… (speaker’s position – against or for?).
3. First, the speaker discusses..., 2nd... (speaker’s points/reasons).
4. For those reasons/points, a speaker objects a legitimacy of the article.
I think there is no definite method or format we can follow. Because we need to improvise (or be flexible) during the exam, it's dangerous to depend on a pre-made format/method. The important thing is being able to mention a speaker’s points in your word. Well, at least this is what I keep reminding myself.
Hope you are relived a bit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks