PDA

View Full Version : LSAT Critical Reasoning-Q13-P22



sarnia
02-16-2004, 04:39 AM
Please take an analytical approach and tell why you think that each option is correct or incorrect. :)

ADMIN EDIT: QUESTION DELETED. PLEASE DO NOT POST LSAC LSAT QUESTIONS.

vreddy
02-16-2004, 07:25 AM
1 cant be inferred(with subsidy, outside control)
3 is out, for subsidy and for profit are alternatives.
5 is converse of 4

2 and 4 are kinda supported by the argument if we dont care much about modal verbs--will and must.

I'd chose 4

Paul78
02-16-2004, 01:59 PM
Agree with D

sarnia
02-18-2004, 04:30 PM
D is the answer. BTW Paul your explanation is always apprecited :D

vsrc100
07-25-2004, 06:24 PM
vreddy, why not 2. Please provide some in detail explanation.

lucky888lucky
06-22-2005, 09:51 AM
it's D.

Point 1) if the press is not profit making, then it is forced to be subsidize. if its subsidized then there is outside control. I diagramed it to look like this: no Profit-->Subsidized-->Outside Control. (reversal of this is: no outside control--> Not subsidized-->then profitable)

Point2) if there is honest journalism, then no subsidies. HJ-->Not Subsidized.

From Point 1's reversal, we found that "Not subsidized-->profitable" so you can add on to point #2. Conclude that HJ-->Not Subsidized-->Profitable (or HJ-->Profitable)

hope that helps!

rakovsky
06-10-2006, 09:55 PM
Setup
Press= Profit making

( outside control = propaganda ) -- > easily subsidized
no honest journalism = subsidized

But:

If (Press = no profit) & (press = no subsidized) --> no survivial

If (press= no profit) & (press = subsidized) --> survival

A) wrong. it doesn't mention that profit making companies are free from control.

B) no , it just won't have to resort to subsidies.

C) no, it only says that not profit making companies must be subsized