A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree and disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. in developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

I strongly agree with the given recommendation because it will provide an uniform education to all students of the nation and it can be said that it wiil be fair with all students whether they belong to urban area and rural area of the nation. but sometimes many educators want that it must be different curriculum for all the states of the nation because students also get the knowledge of their religion and their state and if whole curriculum for the country is same they will not be able to learn about their religion and their state. i believe there can be one solution that there must be at least one subject which is elective for students and which deals with the religion and the state from which a particular student belongs. in 2010 NCERT applies same course for all states in India, but after one year they realise that there must be a subject for students which will provide them the knowledge of their state and their city so NCERT ordered states to apply a new book in their curriculum so students get the knowledge of their state. there is also one more thing can come that if a student shifts from one state to another state he can learn about that state easily if he read the book related to that state in which he is shifted. In India thear are 29 states and each state has different language. so i believe state Government should add State language subject in the curriculum of that state because it will help to save the state language and also prepare students to speak state language with old people of the state.