Re: Profiles and Results 2019
Undergrad: US Top 10 (Triple Major in Econ, Math, Stats)
GRE: 169 Q, 160 V, 5.5 AW
Grad Courses: none
Real Analysis I,II,III (A,A,A), Probability I,II,III (A,A,A),
Intro Proofs (A), Optimization (A), Linear Algebra (A), Abstract Linear Algebra (A)
Multivar Calc I,II (A,A), Diff Eq (A), Intro Stats (A),
Mathematical Stats II,III (A,A), Survey Sampling (A),
Machine Learning (A), Multivariate Analysis (A), Stochastic Simulation (A)
Micro I,II,III (A,A,A-), Game Theory I,II (A,A),
Macro I,II (A,A), Adv. Macro (A-),
Applied Metrics I,II (A,A), Metrics Theory I,II (A,A),
Analytical Methods (A), Corp Finance (A), Health (A), I.O. (A),
Thesis Seminar I,II (A,A)
Intro Algorithms (A), Intro C++ (A), Intro Python I,II (A,A), Intro Racket (A)
- Full-time RA at top 5
- Honors thesis (won award; advisor thinks itís publishable)
- Undergrad RA for applied micro faculty (also my thesis advisor)
- Undergrad RA for theorist
- Two other irrelevant summer RA jobs
Teaching Experience: none
- PI from full-time RA job (well-known; they said it was strong)
- Primary thesis advisor (well-known; probably my best letter)
- ďUnofficialĒ thesis advisor / prof from metrics theory course (junior, but strong letter)
SOP: Typical cover letter. Did not customize by school.
Accepted: Stanford, Princeton, Berkeley, Yale, Chicago, Northwestern, Columbia, Penn
Waitlisted: MIT (rejected)
Rejected: Harvard + B-school programs
Comments: Urch is great overall, but itís a good idea to cross-check opinions here with other sources, especially with your faculty advisors. They are in the best position to give you advice thatís specific to your situation. Talk with multiple faculty members just in case someone gives you idiosyncratic advice.
Re: Profiles and Results 2019
Type of Undergrad: US Top 70 Econ Dept.
Undergrad GPA: 3.4
Type of Grad: MS Econ: US Top 15 Econ Dept.
Grad GPA: 3.5
GRE: 166Q, 163V, 5.0W
Math Courses: Calc I-III, Linear Algebra, Intro to Proofs, Analysis I (grad), Math for Econ (grad)
Econ Courses: Grad: Micro Theory I-II, Macro Theory I, Econometric Theory I-III, Int. Political Econ
Other Courses: Grad: Formal Models (PhD), Political Inequality (PhD),
Letters of Recommendation: 3 faculty from graduate school, all well known. RA for one. Took a class with another who was also my thesis supervisor. Took a PhD class with the third.
Research Experience: Writing a paper with two economist colleagues and submitted it as part of my application. Graduate RA student for a semester. Undergraduate RA for 1.25 years.
Work Experience: 3 years in industry. 1.5 years as an RA at an international organization
Research Interests: Political Econ / Macro and Public Econ
SOP: Stated my interests, explained my qualifications and highlighted my research experience. Slightly modified for each school. Made sure it was cogent and well written.
Other: The bad: average grades. The good: The paper Iím writing was already accepted to conferences. Pretty strong programming background.
Acceptances: Georgetown, UC-Irvine, UT-Austin (off-waitlist), UVA (off-waitlist)
Rejections: Maryland (off-waitlist), BU, BC, UCSD, UWash-Seattle, JHU, CMU, UCDavis, UCSB, NYU-Stern, UCLA-Anderson, Chicago-Booth, USC
Comments: Excited about Georgetown. I only applied to schools in/near large cities, so my partner could find a job. My list would probably have looked differently otherwise.
What would you have done differently?
I made sure to get into a masterís program that would give me the option of pursuing a PhD afterwards if I wanted to. Most of my decisions after starting my MS such as what classes to take, when to take the GRE, where to work, when to start a paper etc., were done with the goal of strengthening some part of my application. So plan ahead, but donít stress too much. It doesnít take a perfect application to get into a good program. Also, apply widely, itís a crapshoot. Good luck.