Jump to content
Urch Forums

Masters in economics - profile evaluation please..


wtvr

Recommended Posts

Hi, everyone, I would really appreciate your opinions and advice. I'm looking to apply for a masters in development economics and keep my options open for a phd. Here is my profile:

 

Type of Undergrad: London School of Economics, going into my third and final year

 

Major: BSc Economics

 

Undergrad GPA: Being a british student I don't know about my GPA, but my grades are noted below.

 

GRE: Haven't taken yet.

 

Math courses:

Mathematical Methods (Calculus and Linear Algebra) - B+

Statistics - A

Econometrics - B+

 

Econ courses:

Economics (first year) - B+

Microeconomics I - B

Macroeconomics - High A

 

Interests : development

 

I want either UK or US but where can I realistically apply with these grades? I don't think there are that many development programs either.

 

Any advice will be very much appreciated....

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

US doesn't have that many renowned masters program. You will have to get a masters degree before you can apply for the US PhD programs (and have a realistic chance of getting in).

 

Canadian masters program would be a good stepping stone for PhD's but there are hardly any development economics masters program. Your best bet would probably be England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're heading for a 1st then you've got a good chance anywhere. A good 2:1 will reduce you're options a little depending on what you want.

 

Assuming you're mainly about the Master's. If you have lots of Money and you might be heading for a 1st you might want to check out Oxford's MSc in Development Economics or stay at LSE for their MSc. Otherwise, I think Sussex might be good for you. In Canada UBC have a few people working on development so you could check them out (plus it's really cheap and you have a much better shot at funding).

 

PhD wise, I think Lokayots right to say that you'll need a Masters for study in the US. Most UK universities have some funding for UK Masters students who intend to continue to PhD; you'll need a bit of a premium on the standard entry requirements to have a chance at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I thought about the Oxford development masters but if I apply this year with these grades do I have any chance of being accepted? Would they give me a conditional offer do you think? I know that the program is very competitive. I assumed they only accepted people with As in everything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think that Oxford Development masters is less competitive than the normal masters, but still competitive enough. I don't know much about the British Schools so I can't comment further on those. As elcapitano said, Canadian master's programs have better funding and are cheaper as well. You should apply to these programs to keep your options open. It would help, if for instance, you don't get into the Oxford Development masters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sussex is taught with somewhat less technical rigour, even for a European department.

 

What aspect of development do you want to study? Trade or financial capital flows? Macroeconomic aspect? Social development? Growth?

 

Many pure Msc economics programs in the UK offer good coursework in these areas. Perhaps you don't need a specialised degree in development economics as at Oxford (with no disrespect for that program).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Canada UBC have a few people working on development so you could check them out (plus it's really cheap and you have a much better shot at funding).

 

I'll mention what I mentioned in a previous thread, and that's that one may have a better shot at funding from UBC over lets say, being an international at LSE, but the other three, U of T, Queen's and UWO will likely give a better shot at any kind of funding. To even really stellar students, UBC's funding is spotty at the master's level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At UBC you can earn $10k if you are full time T.A. That will cover your tuition and part of your living cost. But yes you would probably have to contribute some money yourself. There are a few big scholarships ($16K I think), but they are..very few in number.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand correctly, you're not intending to continue to a PhD.

 

IMHO, if that's the case, then brand repute of the program should be a major consideration for you.

 

Previous posters have already mentioned Oxford and Sussex. Sussex IDS is really good for Industry. The DESTIN courses at LSE also offer good employability. Cambridge has its MPhil in Development Studies.

 

In USA, Harvard's MPA/ID will fit your interests well. Also, if your real intention is to work for IGOs, then MA in International Relations from places like JHU SAIS might not be a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, I was referring to Sussex econ department. The Sussex IDS is a totally different thing. As I said, at Sussex, they teach development economics at a level close to intermediate, slightly above. But the IDS department is renowned for excellency in general development studies. When it comes to studying development in the UK, most professionals seem to recommend Sussex IDS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canuckeconomist is right: the other Canadian schools are more likely to give funding than UBC. I didn't mention them because I don't know much about them i.e. which have strength in development.

 

WRT Sussex Msc Development Econ. I've no idea how technical it is, but for a small course they sem to get quite a few people into DfiD and onto IDS fellowships. For what it's worth, they also changed from an MA last year to an MSc this year.

 

Asianeconomist mentions some good options if you want to go down a more development route. I think the MPAID at Harvard would be phenomenal and it's technical too but I think it's unlikely you'd get in with your current grades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi -- I'm looking for some advice on my profile for either the Oxford's MPhil or MFE Program for entry in 2009. I'm very unsure of my ability to get in and reallly wanted some advice from those of you who have better insight into what they're looking for.

 

I'm looking to apply in R1 and my objective is to then move on to the PhD. I'm not looking for any funding at the moment either.

 

Degree:

BS degree with double major in Actuarial Science & Finance. Minor in Mathematics. Overall GPA: 3.0/4.0 (graduated in 3 yrs) Top university.

 

=> Not a very strong performance at all. But I was the youngest graduate in my year. Will the fact that I took Maths and grad Stats courses fall into their consideration if I score high on the GRE?

 

My courses at undergrad included Calc I-III, Linear Algebra, Stochastic Processes, Investment Mathematics, Regression and Time Series Analysis as well as a slew of Finance courses (although I scored a B to B- average in all these.)

 

* Also did internships at a couple of top investment banks.

 

Will it help to pass the CFA and then apply or will I be considered too old?

 

Experience:

JPMorgan's Fixed Income Group for the last two years. Can provide strong recommendations.

 

GMAT/GRE:

Have not taken the test yet, but am expecting a 720-740 based on practice tests.

 

Don't know if extracurriculars matter, but I'm also an amateur journalist.

 

Looking forward to your opinions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...