Sponsored Ad:
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Another profile evaluation (Applying Fall 2009)

  1. #1
    Trying to make mom and pop proud
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    12


    Good post? Yes | No

    Another profile evaluation (Applying Fall 2009)

    Sponsored Ad:
    Hi guys,
    I'm new aboard on TM and like all you guys want to to a top Econ PhD program. My profile in some ways is kinda up or down (or so I think).
    My profile: I attend UofT and I majored in Econ/Math joint major.
    CGPA: 3.67
    Courses Taken: Inter Macro (A), Micro (A-), Prob. and Stats (B+,A). Intro to Math Stats (A+), Advanced Macro (A), Game Theory (A), Econometrics (B+), Into to proofs (A+), Real Analysis (A), Nonlinear Optimization (A), Linear Algebra I and II (A,A), A couple of macro topics PhD courses International Macro and Macro Forecasting (A+,A) and a microecon topics course (A).

    Research Experience: 2 summers and 1 full year working for a macro prof The work wasn't great but it's RA work none the less and she liked it!

    I kinda feel that my profile has some good but also some weakspots and I think I'll have to get a masters @ UPF, LSE, UBC, Queens, UofT or an MPhil maybe at Oxbridge to have a shot at top 15. My research interest is Macro Theory without a doubt. Also at UPF, I'm curious if people who go there to know how hard it is good to get funding and what sort of GPA can even qualify to be in the reckoning for funding. I'd love all the feedback! Thanks!

  2. #2
    temp. out of retirement
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    401
    Rep Power
    14


    Good post? Yes | No
    As in Austin?

    You have a pretty rockin' profile. Also, your 3.67 appears to be influenced by non-math and econ courses. I vote no master's.


  3. #3
    Click My Avatar! YoungEconomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,025
    Rep Power
    22


    Good post? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by C152dude View Post
    As in Austin?

    You have a pretty rockin' profile. Also, your 3.67 appears to be influenced by non-math and econ courses. I vote no master's.
    I agree.

  4. #4
    Attending Rochester.
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    St. John's, Newfoundland
    Posts
    403
    Rep Power
    15


    Good post? Yes | No
    Yes, please post GPA from math courses and econ courses. Your GRE score will obviously affect things as well. If the former is good, definitely apply top-15 and maybe one MA as a locked-in safety.

    I got in to Rochester and Minnesota coming from a much, much, much worse Canadian university (Memorial), without research experience or grad courses. Though my math/econ GPA was 4.0, and had slightly more math.

  5. #5
    An Urch Guru Pundit Swami Sage asianeconomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    1,269
    Rep Power
    19


    Good post? Yes | No
    How good will be your LORs ? Sometimes, a Masters is justified when you're targeting good/great LORs from your Masters professors (mostly because the UGrad LORs are not up to scratch).
    The Pens have been lifted and the Pages have dried. - recorded by At Tirmidhee.

  6. #6
    Loving the Ivory Tower Canuckonomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,194
    Rep Power
    19


    Good post? Yes | No
    I'm going to offer slightly different advice.

    Congrats again to Thesus for his great admits. He is a model for Canadians attempting to get into good US programs straight out of UG. However, I and several others tried the same, from schools such as UBC, Queen's and U of T, and had little luck (mind you, I was only shooting at UPenn, NWU, UCSD and Cornell.) My GPA was like yours, but a little weaker on the math side (grades wise) with a few stellar Ph.D level marks.

    Anyhow, I'm taking a master's this year, and to be honest, I'm really looking forward to it. I've heard a lot from people with excellent profiles, who took a master's anyway, and proceeded with a Ph.D afterwards, only to find it easier than others. Not to mention that the master's was one of the best years of their lives, academically and socially.

    My suggestion is to indeed apply to some Ph.D schools, but I'd apply to two, maybe three, MA programs, just so you can have some choice when it comes to funding. If I had just applied to LSE or UBC, and not Queen's, I would have missed out on a pretty sweet funding package, and in the end, it ended up being the best offer. The additional $75-100 for each additional application isn't much when the funding offers can swing by the thousands.

    Best of luck in applying!

    Canuck.
    Canuckonomist, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Toronto '15

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Profile evaluation for PhD in cs(Fall 2009)
    By scorpion_flower in forum Computer Science Admissions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-10-2008, 06:07 PM
  2. profile evaluation for fall 2009
    By magic2782 in forum Computer Science Admissions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-13-2008, 06:13 AM
  3. MS CS Fall 2009 Profile evaluation
    By dnash in forum Graduate Admissions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-22-2008, 04:08 PM
  4. profile evaluation for fall 2009
    By magic2782 in forum Graduate Admissions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-22-2008, 03:06 PM
  5. Profile Evaluation for MS, PhD in CS fall 2009
    By angeloid2005 in forum Computer Science Admissions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-13-2008, 08:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •