Jump to content
Urch Forums

dyiwang

1st Level
  • Posts

    243
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

dyiwang last won the day on March 16 2022

dyiwang had the most liked content!

Converted

  • Occupation
    Economist

Converted

  • My Tests
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

3,146 profile views

dyiwang's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

74

Reputation

  1. Yeah, I think you have a shot, but seems like you are missing real analysis, or is that called something else in your course load?
  2. I would suggest that you submit your research topics via a CV or a writing sample. The SOP is more about showing that, from a personal level, you are well aware what getting a PhD entails, have realistic expectations about what you plan to do with your PhD, and have seriously thought about the prospect of being a researcher as a career path and come to the conclusion that you want this. There will be other places in your application for you to talk about your research and your findings. So there is no need to duplicate the information in your SOP. Good luck.
  3. Admission people evaluate a candidate along two key dimensions in hope to identify high-quality future researchers in the field: learning capability and research potential. The first dimension is easy, as past academic performance is typically a strong predictor of future learning success. After all, no program wants to accept candidates and later find out that the candidates just can't master the tool kit and pass the comp. The second dimension is less observable, hence the word choice "potential." And some programs ask for optional writing samples to help them evaluate this. In light of this, I would say rank your writing sample materials in the following order: 1. In the rare case that you already have publications in a respectful journal in the field, then this is a no brainer. But I admit that very few people have this choice pre-PhD. 2. If you have a thesis or a working paper that is ready to be submitted to a journal, even not to a top or top field, then still it is a good choice. As it shows that you at least have had exposure to the research process and can be productive. 3. A research proposal that describes a topic that might eventually evolve into a paper later into your PhD career, and maybe with luck a chapter in your dissertation. 4. If you don't have any of the above, and writing sample is optional, then I would consider not submitting one. Because at this point what you are left with is maybe a class essay, or a term paper, but none of these would be too revealing of your potential of a researcher. Best of luck.
  4. I am not sure if that's the best approach for an effective SOP, talking about a paper I mean.
  5. Replying to a post over 15 years later, I did meet THE ONE during my PhD! So all worked out great! 😁
  6. Here is a thought. Given that you were accepted to other programs, why not e-mail these program directors, explain your situation, and politely ask if you can get a spot next year? They might come back and ask whether you are willing to commit to come if you were given a spot, and you can answer honestly. Might save you a lot of trouble. Good luck!
  7. Hi All, I used this forum a lot when I applied for my PhD, and eventually got my PhD in Econ from Stanford. While at Stanford, for a couple of years I came back to answer questions for perspective students contemplating Stanford, but that was over a decade ago. Then life got busy. Now I am an industry economist in the financial industry by day, and still publish academically during my spare time (at a frequency of two or three papers per year), and of course I have a family and good life. One of my advisers once told me that to a serious economist, there are two hard currencies in this profession, money and publications. So I have been operating at the efficient frontier of those two currencies subject to my ability constraint 🙂 . Happy to take any questions from those who are curious about my life as an economist after graduating. I remember my PhD experience fondly and am happy to answer questions about my experience as well for those who are interested, but things might have changed. Good luck to all and hope all of you become successful economists.
  8. Wow. Thank you for keeping this forum going and providing this public service for 20 years. I remember that this forum used to be affiliated with Test magic or something like that, which if I recall correctly provided for profit test prep and application advice. So I always thought that this forum was free because it was affiliated with a for-profit business.
  9. Oh, and here is my LinkedIn profile just in case. https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-wang-42b85932 I am not a full time academic but still publishes academically during my spare time at a rate of a couple of publications per year.
  10. Hi Erin, I am an economist and would like to volunteer. I have been using this forum since I was applying for my Phd back in 2005. The downside is that I am also quite busy so the amount of time I can volunteer will likely be limited and perhaps irregular. Feel free to email me at dyiwang@uchicago.edu
  11. Truth telling here is the dominant strategy in my opinion. If the school deems you "too good for them" and rejects you, which you have no way of verify anyway, then that school is not the right fit. PhD application is a mutual selection process, and any school who has a problem with the truth has bigger issues.
  12. I know for a fact that one indeed can, but it's tough. A few years ago I mentored someone through his application process. He had to do a gap year because he didn't do real analysis during his undergraduate education. He had no RA experience. Graduated from Penn State undergrad, which is not a top 30 program in econ I don't think. Decent LORs from his college professors. No thesis work. To be honest I thought top 30 was a long shot for him at the time, but I told him that it's worth a try. And he got into UVA, which I think is arguably top 30, although there are 40 schools that think they are top 30 🙂 So good luck!
  13. I suggest that you take the Vanderbilt offer. Upon reviewing your math background, you have enough math courses to give you a legitimate shot as a PhD applicant, so any additional math courses that you might take as a math major would yield relatively low marginal value in your application. Instead, your eventual PhD application can benefit a lot more with some RA experience, which you mentioned in your post that you are likely to get (or at least more likely to get than extending your undergrad by a year) if I were to take what you said at face value. And I have no reason not to. So I think this is an easy call based on the information you have provided. Of course, if you were to tell me that instead of attending a typical undergrad (which I assume you are), you are actually at one of the top 10 US universities for undergrad education (based on say US News Ranking if you will), then yeah, get that math major.
  14. Thanks for sharing. I agree that it is definitely uncommon for applicants to have publications in top journals and don't mean to imply otherwise. That said, it is not uncommon for RAs at the IMF to co-author on working papers in the IMF Working Paper Series. Granted, the quality variance of these working papers can be surprisingly high if one had the chance to read through some of them, but some of them (I would say around 10% to be conservative) would deserve at least some attention from mid-tier journals (and that is indeed "decent" if a RA happens to be a co-author on a paper of such quality, but clearly far from being tenured at a respectful program). But even such mediocrity from the perspective of those already with a PhD would be tremendously value-adding for someone who is about to prepare for one's PhD application. I also mentioned the RAP explicitly in my initial response, which is a program specifically targeting top-quality undergrad candidates (as opposed to typical RA positions at the IMF which generally require a MA degree in a relevant field). For those undergrads who are selected to the RAP (Research Analyst Program), the understanding is that this program would be a stepping stone to something else. The number selected is quite limited. Participants of the RAP often get the chance to work with senior ranking people who can be quite influential in academia. I know all of this as a former IMF economist who know people in the RAP. Hence, at least from my humble perspective, I am indeed giving very reasonable advice on how to compare RA/predoc work if the primary goal is to enhance one's competitiveness in the PhD application process. Best of luck and all the best.
  15. If you are admitted to the RAP and don't have better RA options, then the IMF opportunity is a decent choice. It's a full time job, but hours are friendly. What you makes out of it can be path dependent. If you happen to impress the chief economist of the IMF and receive a strong LOR, then I would say you just punched your ticket to a top 10 PhD program. If you put in some extra work and get a couple of decent working papers under your belt during your time there, and by decent I mean R&R at decent journals, then you would be an impressive candidate even without that LOR from the chief economist. If you just allow the friendly hours to lure you into doing the work and not much more, then it wouldn't help your PhD ambition too much, nor will it help your bank account that much either.
×
×
  • Create New...