Hi everybody,
This is my first post here, but i've read the threads for some time. I have a question about the Warwick masters degree and whether it makes for good preparation for getting into a good US PhD programme.
Long story made short, I applied for a couple of masters degrees in the UK this spring and Warwick (and York) were the best I was accepted into (no declines). I was too late to apply for LSE and University College and hadn't taken the GRE test so I was also too late to apply to UPF and Amsterdam for example (I realise this sounds awful, but I had my reasons).
To give you some background: I completed my BSc degree at the best economics school in my country (non-eu) and was among the top 10%. I have solid grades and am certain that I will be able to get at least 780 on the GRE-test. I think my LoRs are good (nothing spectacular though) and I've been out of school for 2 years, working as an analyst. My main interest ly in public economics, labour economics and behavioral economics.
My questions would be:
1) Should I take the Warwick masters degree this fall or wait for one year and try to get into some better schools to increase my chances of getting into a solid PhD programme in the US? I was rather inclined to go to Warwick this fall, but after reading some of the threads here I'm not so sure, as Warwick has been described as a second tier school and at a dreadful location.
2) At the risk of sounding cocky and unrealistic, I think I would be able to do well in the Warwick programme - wouldn't it be better to be among the top 10% in a 2nd tier school than a mediocre student in a 1st tier school (i.e. LSE)?
3) Berkeley would be my absolute first choice in the US - do I have any chance of getting into the PhD programme there with a BSc degree from an unknown university (albeit the best in my country) and a masters from Warwick? Should I rather wait the year and try my luck getting into a better school?