PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: BA in Econ at an East Asian Uni
Undergrad GPA: 3.6/4.3
Type of Grad: N/A
Grad GPA: N/A
GRE: 630/800/3.5
Math Courses: Math for Econ(Econ Dept), Stat for Econ(Econ Dept), Statistics(Stat Dept), Foundations of Economic Analysis(Econ Dept)
Econ Courses (PhD-level): None
Econ Courses (undergrad-level): Pretty much every main course, from introductory micro and macro to game theory and econometrics
Letters of Recommendation: 2 from Econ Profs of my Dept(PhD UCLA and Northwestern respectively), 1 from my supervisor at work
Research Experience: Have been working for the central bank of my country for 2 1/2 yrs specializing in reserve management
Teaching Experience: None
Research Interests: (Positive)Political Economy, Labor, Public, Experimental, (possibly)Financial/Corporate History
Concerns: Lack of math courses, lack of teaching/research experience
Other: None
Applying to: Vanderbilt(PhD), Texas A&M(PhD), Rutgers(PhD), U of Florida(PhD), SUNY at Albany(PhD), Toulouse School of Economics(M2), U of Toronto(MA, doctoral stream), Queen's(MA), UBC(MA)
Admitted: Rutgers(w/o funding), Texas A&M(with funding), Toulouse School of Economics(not decided)
Pending: the rests
---
Hi guys! I finally post my results so far. :) I decided to do a PhD in Econ last year, so I'm not that well prepared.
Among the admissions I've received, I am thinking about Texas A&M and TSE. Considering my interests, which institution do you guys think would be better to go? I initially thought TSE as my priority, but my friends doing their PhDs in the States say that Texas A&M is absolutely and definitely better. They say most European PhDs are not welcomed outside the continent and TSE is only good at IO and TAMU is not that bad.(but I heard that the Econ Dept at TAMU is sinking?)
My dream is doing research and teaching at a research school. I know the reality, so I said dream not goal. But anyway, which one would be better?
Thanks for your time. May god bless you all!