abhishek_mumbai

Hello Erin, I have been using this forum for two months now and it is great! Thanks a lot for maintaining it so well. I wish I could have helped you more than below suggestion. While I was using the forum, I realized a score of improvement. I will try to keep it short and simple. Currently, on a thread, there is a question at the top followed by lots of member posts - few are really good but rest are not. Along with it, the real good posts are lost somewhere between bunch of other posts. The thread originator should be the last person to write the post but actually he is not. Ultimately, it gets messy and difficult to search the core of the post later by other users. I recommend that we ask every thread originator to write a conclusion just before closing a thread. We will ask members to write good points on all posts, lessons learned and the final answer in conclusion. Then, there will be two more changes - a) display the conclusion at the top of the post, just after the original question. b) change the purge process (that removes the threads after certain time) to remove everything other than question and conclusion. I hope, you get it what I mean here. Pros 1. Better search results: Future members or students need not to go thru maze of posts to find what they are looking for. 2. Less storage are: We do not need to retain all post (most of them are unncessary) in a thread. We can just delete all the posts retaining question and conclusion knowing that we won't loose important data. This will save COST of operating this forum. 3. Member involvment: By asking thread originator to write the conclusion at the end, we are not only ensuring that he/she understand the answer but also ensuring that they do not write fake posts. I have seen people who just post to increase their post counts so they can download later or become guru. We are actually teaching some DISCIPLNE to future managers. :) 4. Edge over other competitors: I know that no other forum offers this to their members and I know many people finding the material on these forums. Few told me how they found the thread but it had more than 500 posts and they did not know what to read out of those posts. 5. Longer retention period: Now, when we are not storing all the unncessary posts, we can actually retain the question and conclusion for longer period, may for ever. Cons 1. Extra efforts by the thread originator: It may discourage some members to write new threads but I am sure that serious members will be unaffected as they are dedicated to the cause (MBA). 2. Investment for IT changes: Although it may cost some dollars to you for these changes, but it will save you lot more in future. I hope you like it.. Pls let me know if I can be any help. Members, please add if you have anything. It is good for all of us. Thanks, Abhishek

47 M 37 V => sill 690.. you may be unfortunate on first 15 questions and on many non-experimental question.. I beleive if you give it second chance .. say after a week.. you can score 720-730.. You already look in good shape to get that.. It is just that some days are bad.. and you need to give a second chance.. else.. 690 with your profile sounds competetive for these colleges.. you may not need to worry about your scores at all.. but if you want to be confident while applying, give it a second shot.. That's all I can advise..

ys 132 nice explanation, guys

solve every question on this forum.. they are of pretty good difficulty level..

Yes. that's me when i went to Florida few months ago.. I appreciate your help in advance..

I believe this question is already on TM.. pls search before creating new threads..

Great! How do you make these gadgets? I wish to make one for my work..

B C D who is they? pronoum error D.. the cause is not known, unknown too is .. Incorrect formation IMO A

All SC questions should be in SC forum.. that's why you do not have any replies till now.. IMO D parallel structure.. his atheism, his immoral behaviour, and his radical politics.

pls post in scentence correction forums.. you will get quick and more replies.. we do not expect these posts here... (A) extending over hundreds of thousands of square miles and that contained (not parallel.. extending and that contained) (B) extensive over hundreds of thousands of square miles, and it contained (extensive is incorrect) © that extended over hundreds of thousands of square miles and containing not parallel (that extended and containing) (D) that extended over hundreds of thousands of square miles and contained Correct! (E) which was extending over thousands of square miles and containing which is not preceded by comma(,) so it refer to subject of preceding clause i.e. King Shaka.. King Shaka is not extending over miles.. IMO D

abhasjha, I never heard of "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language". What does it have? Is it really helpful? can you pls explain more about this book and how it helped you..

Me too.. I had accuracy rate of 50% when I started the prepparations. Now, it is 75% but I am stuck here.. My target score is 750 that means my accuracy rate should be atleast 90%.. I am stuck.. Can you please help how to take it above 75%..

q1 is subjunctive.. IMO D q1 => curfew always come with THE.. "a curfew" is incorrect.. IMO B OA pls

I think you did not read by post.. here.. 123rk34, I think it in C properly refers to Federal Reserve.. C can be eliminated by "keep control of inflation" and would (rest of scentence is in present and it is not a request)

by the way, what is OA?