missionGMAT

Dear all, I have started a blog to share my journey to my dream b school. Please visit and share your feedback. The link for the blog is http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/ Lets share our experiences and add value to each other's lives. Cheers, missionGMAT

Hi Brent, Yes it was weird and this has put me in doubts. I never got less than 48 on the CATs and was expecting same here. A 48 or 49 would have put me in a better position. Now I am contemplating a retake. What are your views on same? I am not applying this year so I do have time at hand. Thanks.

Its funny..it really is! All through my preparation, Verbal was my pain area and Quants was something I was comfortable with. Always finished quants with at least 10 minutes remaining and never scored less than 48 in the practice tests but the real thing was different and pulled down my score to a 680. And the worst part about a 680 is that its an average score - its a score which is in the range of scores of schools I want to apply to but its just that- average. If it were 640 or something, the next step would have been to retake but a 680 is like standing on a three way and banging you head to decide what to do next. So once the initial frustration is out here, let me breakdown my experience: AWA: AWA was fine. Nothing unexpected. AWA infact helped me calm down my nerves and got me into the test taking mode. I had read chineseburned templates and they were very helpful in creating the very important basic structure. You can find the template here: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html Quants: First five questions were ok, I breezed through them and then the difficulty level increased and I was happy that I was doing fine. But after say 7th question, it became really different (I would not say difficult because the questions were not tough. They all were doable.) in the sense that they were long questions which took time to read and then with long calculations. For example, calculating area of odd shapes for which the only way was to breakdown the shape into rectangles and triangles - calculating the base or height, calculating individual areas and then summing it up. I got 2 questions like that. Doable but time consuming. I guess my entire quants experience was weird to say the least. I got at least 10 questions from geometry and co-ordinate geometry, 3-4 from compound interest calculations, few from probability and these questions came in rows. I got 4 co-ordinate questions in a row. And all this made me run out of time. I practically had to guess last 3 questions. Verbal: Verbal was predictable. Very GPrep like. The question formats and structures were similar to Gprep. I got 4 passages out of which only one was super lengthy and rest were ok. The CR and SC questions were not very confusing however, SC did test some real skills :) All in all, I am left confused after the test. I have decided to take a week's break and then may be jump again into the wagon and tame the GMAT. Wish me luck!!! P.S. Tips to improve quants will be appreciated.

for the benefit of future test takers, OA should be A as explained by Ron: NEAR SPACECRAFT-KINDLY HELP!! • Manhattan GMAT Forums

OA is D. Thanks Mocka

yes OA is D.

IMO B. The argument says that bank should reallocate the voting shares to shape better economic policy. The objective of the bank is to make better policy and we have to find how allocating more apt shares will help the bank to make better policies. B says the same. C is not correct because of two reasons: 1. Its too extreme - Only voting shares that are precisely proportional to each countty's contrlbution to the global economy are appropriate for the Intercontinental Bank. 2. It makes you ask the question - Do I want to know what's apt for Intercontinental Bank or do I want to know how can bank make better policy (which is what you want to know...isn't it?) I hope its clear to you now.

Even I think, it should be E. C is too extreme and also the use of "most" in the argument leaves scope for someone who can forge and get in. So we really cant say that nobody can get in. Can the new members discuss it out.

I agree with you on "will fail" part but am still thinking that "failed" or "has failed" is required to make it consistent with "stated". As you rightly said, POE points to option A only..

But what are your views on the use of "fail" in B. Should it not be "failed" or "will fail"...

In the game Cako, a player is awarded one tick for every third Alb captured, and one click for every fourth Berk captured. The total score is equal to the product of clicks and ticks. If a player has a score of 77, how many Albs did he capture? (1) The difference between Albs captured and Berks captured is 7. (2) The number of Albs captured is divisible by 4.

IMO B The doctrinal dispute resulted in the dismissal of the president of the seminary, who was charged with teaching false doctrine and with administrative misconduct. (A) charged with teaching false doctrine and with administrative misconduct - the president was charged with two things: false doctrine and administrative misconduct. So the second with is irrelevant here. (B) charged with teaching false doctrine and administrative misconduct - CORRECT. Parallel construction © being charged that he taught false doctrine and administrative misconduct - being is redundant and wordy (D) charged with both false doctrine teaching and administrative misconduct - not parallel (E) teaching false doctrine and administrative misconduct as charged - passive and wordy

IMO, the sequence of distribution of resume doesn't matter here so the total number of ways = 7C4 = 7!/4!3! = 35 ways

Yeah.. I missed that d is seven positive. Thanks guys!

IMO C. Let the total clients = 100 No. of clients using both credit card and cheque book = 30. Let total no of clients using credit card = x So, no. of clients using credit card but no cheque book = 0.4x According to question, 0.4x+30 = x x= 50 (which is the total number of clients using credit card) Since we had assumed total no. of client to be 100, this value of x is the percentage answer. You can aslo do it by making table as: CC no CC Total CB 30 no CB 0.4x Total x 100 It took little less than a min to solve this. I hope this was helpful.