PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: BS Economics, BA US history, minor in math from top 50 Econ. University
Undergrad GPA: 3.65
Type of Grad: N/A
Grad GPA: N/A
GRE: 165/162/5.0 Q/V/AW
Math Courses: Calc I-III (A), Dif-equations (A), Linear Algebra (A), Intro to proofs ©, Adv. Calc. (B+), intro to stats (B+), probability theory (A), Real Analysis I (B+), Topology ©, Experimental Stats (A), Mathematical stats (A), Stochastic processes (pending)
Econ Courses: 3.9 overall for 30 credits. Courses of note: Regression analysis (A), Econometrics(A), Adv. Macro (A)
Other Courses: Intro to C++, intro to java
Letters of Recommendation: 2 good (1 math professor, 1 econ professor) both fairly well known in field/cited, 1 glowing but non-academic
Research Experience: none beyond my coursework.
Teaching Experience: 1 year teaching middle/high school (student teacher). Helped write an online course.
Research Interests: public policy / general macro
SOP: Pretty standard, maybe a little vague. On half tried to explain bad math grades both (all the B’s and 1 C occurred during the same semester); on the other half I omitted my explanation for the bad semester. Also, I tried to emphasize the unique parts (the history and teaching background).
Other: an almost complete teaching license/certificate (3 credits short)
RESULTS:
Acceptances: none
Waitlists: none
Rejections: Cornell, Minnesota, Boston College, Carnegie-Mellon, Penn State, Michigan state, UC Davis, UC Santa Barbara, USC, UNC
Pending: none
Attending: none
Comments: Ouch!
What would you have done differently? Take math earlier and spread it out. Most importantly, I would have pursued undergraduate research experience as that seemed to be the number 1 limiting factor. Perhaps a more definitive research area in my SOP.
How accurate were others' predictions of your range of admissions?
Obviously my professors/advisors had some higher predictions than were warranted, so not very accurate at all.