sandy22

Could anybody please let me know how to change into that case above? Suggest me several ways if you know Thanks,

Hey there, Could somebody explain for me what is the difference between MS Taxation degree and MS degree in Accountancy? Which program you think that it might require more years of working to be able to do well? By the way, have any of you here known about the MS Taxation program at Cal State Univ, Northridge? Is it good? Thanks,

1. Harold is tiling a rectangular kitchen floor with an area that is expressed as . What could the dimensions of the floor be in terms of x? a. (x + 1)(x + 5)b. (x − 1)(x − 5)c. (x − 2)(x + 3)d. (x + 2)(x + 3) I think C should be used as 'Multiple' (in this case, C=5 because of 1*5 or (-1)*(-5)); and B should be considered "Sum" (in this case, B=6 because of (1+5))

what should be the answer and why? FANG: TOOTH :: A. gum : mouth B. elbow : arm C. bank : river D. finger : digit E. summit : mountain -> Understand which is the main link for this.

5. {: OFFICIATE} D. secretary: dictate E. umpire: compete "officiate" seems kind of neutral word (having characteristics somewhat regular); meanwhile [compete] (as well as [preside]) seems clear, and quite strong word. [secretary: dictate] is suitable with the original pair.

1. SENSITIVE: DISTRESS A. submissive: master C. gullible: upset D. arrogant: impress E. sympathetic: condemn The original pair of words expresses meaning in a slighter way than the pair expresses in (E). "condemn" sounds too strong (esp. in the context with its left-hand word "sympathetic"). [submissive],[master] both relate to the area in which the original pair tries to establish the relationship.

{ : } -> having common characteristics which is not postive (destroyed, obstable) A. cacophony B. deluge : rain C. vista : sights B did the good job showing the sharing function between two words, "deluge", "rain" both create a lot of water, thus somewhat have negative consequence (generally).

|hedonist:[unstinting]~{=++ [irresolute]©++ (b) is out of discuss (the first should be about the person)} (a. :insignificant b. thug:aggressive c. :irresolute d. :generous e. :manifest)| => For the right-hand word |(a. protagonist:insignificant b. thug:aggressive c. politician:irresolute d. benefactor:generous e. drunkard:manifest); { => (a) could occur in both case being negative or postive (meaning)>}|

Not sure. But E seems better. Sth [DISPARATE] not related, not fit together; sth [cogent] very convincing, reasonable.

1. Infiltrate : Enter :: A. comply : index B. invade : assault C. allege : prove D. insinuate : say E. disclose : announce When you [say] that I am robust... do you [insinuate] that I am getting fat?

The original pair of words shows contrast/parallel ("fear" opp "daunt", but, [FEARLESS ] // [DAUNT ]. => D is right. wrong

Agree too. A is right. {For ©, [certain] is indeed // with [iNEVITABLE]; but "INEVITABLE" has a trend of happening many times (in whatever cases sth happens) meanwhile the opposite for" CHANCE". However, [regularity] seems to have many chances to occur too (which also correlate with the left word [certain])}.

Postmodern architecture is not concerned with the easy goal of returning to the past but with the more { / } and difficult aim of ___ historical forms into a new and complex whole. A. important...changing B. subtle...integrating C. intellectual...updating D. rewarding...dramatizing E. ornamental...compressing