Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'h-index'.
So as we know, H index is actually pretty subject-dependent, which means that we cannot compare the index across different subjects. Then, in the field of strategic management, how high should it be for a scholar to be considered little-known/somewhat recognized/well-known/prestigious? I can point out several scholars in the field who might very well be considered to be prestigious: Michael E. Porter, h-Index: 180 David J. Teece, h-Index: 106 Jay Barney, h-Index: 87 But what about those whose h-Index is 70? 56? 40? 30? Might I know from you guys if there's a general understanding regarding the use of h-Index in the field? Thanks for time and attention!