shadoWizard Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 (edited) Lets say we have Sqrt[(-3)^2] if i solve it the way i know i'll get -3. But recently I was watching a math video online and it said that the solution would be +3. Why is that? I must add that the way I solve this expression is as follows. http://www.www.urch.com/forums/attachments/gre-math/6611-very-simple-consept-bugging-me-untitled.jpg Is this the wrong way of solving the square root? Please help Regards Edited November 7, 2012 by shadoWizard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil2011 Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 I think You can not bring out -3 from radical unless you square it. your way is correct and because of that when we have (9)1/2----> we have two root -3 and 3 because both make your equation correct. (3)^2=9 (-3)^2=9 so (9)^(0.5)= 3 or -3 But you are not eligible for bringing out -3 below the radical. so (-3)^0.5 is not possible.you should square -3 below the radical and then bringing it out. this time you are sure the root was -3 not 3 because you have seen it before squaring it. Best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoWizard Posted November 8, 2012 Author Share Posted November 8, 2012 lil2011 thanks for the answer. But this is what i needed to ask that why am i not eligible to bring out -3 as you said? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil2011 Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 Its not defined - as you know the radical of negative number is imaginary are you familiar with this kind of numbers: 3+3i actually this is 3+3(-1)^(1/2) we don't have this concept at GRE exam. its related to advanced math. so that you should only think about real number. Best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadoWizard Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 But when I multiply the 2 and 1/2 (in exponents) both the twos are cancelled out so we never touch -3. So before we reach the -ve number, sq. root is cancelled... isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil2011 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 When you omit radical you obtain (1/2) they are not there simultaneously.So that you can not do that with negative number.negative number can not come out unless you say : first I square (-3) so it would be 9 below the radical then I square root from 9 which is +3 and come out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.